Dear Jeff, On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 3:02 PM Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > You use a getter function to retrieve the value of ret.to, which is > fine. Is there a specific reason why you're not using a setter function > to save the value?
I did this because I have access to ret.to in the libcpp
functions! Outside, the structure of that type is unknown and only a
pointer, so it needs the getter function.
Sincerely,
JeanHeyd
