On 25/01/2012 03:27, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
> Sorry, one more case that gcc accepts where it is not clear what the
> result should be:
>
> -----------------------------
> #pragma GCC visibility push(protected)
>
> int x;
> class __attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) foo {
> static int a;
> #pragma GCC visibility pop
> static int b;
> };
> int y;
>
> int foo::a;
> int foo::b;
> -----------------------------
>
> Should this be reject (as happens with namespaces)? If not what is the
> expected result? Currently we get
>
> x -> protected
> y -> default
> a -> hidden
> b -> hidden
According to the manual:
> In C++, `#pragma GCC visibility' affects only namespace-scope
> declarations. Class members and template specializations are not
> affected; if you want to override the visibility for a particular
> member or instantiation, you must use an attribute.
Looks like it's working to me.
cheers,
DaveK
