On 1/20/21 11:27 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:

On 1/18/21 12:31 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here after resolving the address of a template-id inside decltype, we
end up instantiating the chosen specialization from the call to
mark_used in resolve_nondeduced_context, even though only its type is
needed.

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look for
trunk?

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/71879
        * semantics.c (finish_decltype_type): Temporarily increment
        cp_unevaluated_operand during call to resolve_nondeduced_context.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/71879
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-71879.C: New test.
---
   gcc/cp/semantics.c                          | 2 ++
   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-71879.C | 5 +++++
   2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-71879.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index c8a6283b120..cad55665ce8 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -10098,7 +10098,9 @@ finish_decltype_type (tree expr, bool
id_expression_or_member_access_p,
       /* The type denoted by decltype(e) is defined as follows:  */
   +  ++cp_unevaluated_operand;
     expr = resolve_nondeduced_context (expr, complain);
+  --cp_unevaluated_operand;

Hmm, is there a reason not to have cp_unevaluated_operand set through the
whole function?  We might stick 'cp_unevaluated u;' at the top of the function
and remove the existing messing with cp_unevaluated_operand.  Or assert that
it's set and fix the callers to leave it set longer.

That makes sense to me.  AFAICT the only parts of finish_decltype_type
tha are sensitive to cp_unevaluated_operand are
resolve_nondeduced_context and instantiate_nondependent_expr_sfinae,
but it makes sense to have cp_unevaluated_operand set throughout the
function.

The following passes limited testing, does it look OK for trunk after a
full bootstrap+regtest?

OK.

-- >8 --

Subject: [PATCH] c++: Fix excessive instantiation inside decltype [PR71879]

Here after resolving the address of a template-id inside decltype, we
end up instantiating the chosen specialization (from the call to
mark_used in resolve_nondeduced_context), even though only its type is
needed.

This patch sets cp_unevaluated_operand throughout finish_decltype_type,
so that in particular it's set during the call to
resolve_nondeduced_context within.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/71879
        * semantics.c (finish_decltype_type): Set up a cp_unevaluated
        sentinel at the start of the function.  Remove a now-redundant
        manual adjustment of cp_unevaluated_operand.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/71879
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-71879.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/semantics.c                          | 5 +++--
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-71879.C | 5 +++++
  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-71879.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index 244fc70d02d..834885616db 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -10080,6 +10080,9 @@ finish_decltype_type (tree expr, bool 
id_expression_or_member_access_p,
        return error_mark_node;
      }
+ /* The operand of decltype is an unevaluated expression. */
+  cp_unevaluated u;
+
    /* Depending on the resolution of DR 1172, we may later need to distinguish
       instantiation-dependent but not type-dependent expressions so that, say,
       A<decltype(sizeof(T))>::U doesn't require 'typename'.  */
@@ -10095,9 +10098,7 @@ finish_decltype_type (tree expr, bool 
id_expression_or_member_access_p,
      }
    else if (processing_template_decl)
      {
-      ++cp_unevaluated_operand;
        expr = instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae (expr, complain);
-      --cp_unevaluated_operand;
        if (expr == error_mark_node)
        return error_mark_node;
      }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-71879.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-71879.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9da4d40ca70
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype-71879.C
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// PR c++/71879
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <class T> void f(T x) { x.fail(); }
+using R = decltype(&f<int>);


Reply via email to