On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 02:30:56PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:59:18PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:10:39PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > > > > The whole thread is at > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/gcc/patch/20201120000524.ga...@ibm-toto.the-meissners.org/ > > > > . > > > > > > > > I approved *that* version of the patch. > > > > > > Yes you approved the built-in renaming patch and I checked in the patch > > > that > > > you approved (rather than the modifications that I submitted). > > > > > > However, this is about the second patch (that provides conversions between > > > _Float128 and Decimal), which as far as I can tell was not approved. > > > That is > > > what this particular question is about. > > > > I see no second patch? > > > > > So, I rewrote the whole patch so that it will work with older GLIBC's. > > > > Did you check in what I approved or not? It is a very simple question, > > it's just about facts, with a simple yes/no answer. > > Yes I checked in that patch earlier this morning (the original patch that you > approved). > > The second patch I want you to review is:
"This patch replaces the following three patches:" Please send a patch that modifies *current* code, and that is *tested* with that. With a good explanation, and a commit message for *that* patch (not for other, older patches). Segher
