On 2/7/21 9:07 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hi Jerry,
OK for trunk and backport to 10 since it is simple enough?
OK for trunk.
Because this is a user-visible change (even if we did the wrong
thing before) I don't feel that we should backport (but I am
open to suggestions otherwise).
Could you also mention this in gcc-11/changes.html ?
Best regards
Thomas
The above was committed. I had a very frustrating experiance with the
push process. Over and over attempting to push and having it rejected
for an invalid PR reference. The directory that holds the runtime
library is called "libgfortran". The official gcc component in Bugzilla
is called "libfortran". There is no letter "g" in that component name
and thus the hooks rejected my push attempts. The only reason I figured
it out, after exhausting about 25 other variations I could think of is
that I thought "What does the PR think this is?"
Well that was not intuitively obvious, but my bug tracking persistance
hung in there. Sheesh!
Just telling people so others might be aware of this little detail.
Thomas, I will get around to updating the changes.html.
Thanks and best regards,
Jerry
