Hi all,

Here is a v2 patch which provides a more obviously fake answer to
TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL: this can hopefully go in for GCC 11. For GCC 12, it
seems that we should consider removing the target hook.

Original patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566405.html

---

As discussed in the PR, we currently have two different numbering
schemes for SVE builtins: one for C, and one for C++. This is
problematic for LTO, where we end up getting confused about which
intrinsic we're talking about. This patch inserts placeholders into the
registered_functions vector to ensure that there is a consistent
numbering scheme for both C and C++.

This patch uses integer_zero_node as a placeholder node instead of
building a function decl. This is safe because the node is only returned
by the TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL hook, which (on AArch64) is only used for
validation when builtin decls are streamed into lto1.

Bootstrapped and regtested on aarch64-linux-gnu, OK for trunk?

Thanks,
Alex

gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR target/99216
        * config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc
        (function_builder::add_function): Add placeholder_p argument, use
        placeholder decls if this is set.
        (function_builder::add_unique_function): Instead of conditionally adding
        direct overloads, unconditionally add either a direct overload or a
        placeholder.
        (function_builder::add_overloaded_function): Set placeholder_p if we're
        using C++ overloads. Use the obstack for string storage instead
        of relying on the tree nodes.
        (function_builder::add_overloaded_functions): Don't return early for
        m_direct_overloads: we need to add placeholders.
        * config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.h
        (function_builder::add_function): Add placeholder_p argument.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR target/99216
        * g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr99216.C: New test.
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc 
b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc
index 25612d2ea52..f44f81f1375 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.cc
@@ -999,12 +999,29 @@ registered_function &
 function_builder::add_function (const function_instance &instance,
                                const char *name, tree fntype, tree attrs,
                                uint64_t required_extensions,
-                               bool overloaded_p)
+                               bool overloaded_p,
+                               bool placeholder_p)
 {
   unsigned int code = vec_safe_length (registered_functions);
   code = (code << AARCH64_BUILTIN_SHIFT) | AARCH64_BUILTIN_SVE;
-  tree decl = simulate_builtin_function_decl (input_location, name, fntype,
-                                             code, NULL, attrs);
+
+  /* We need to be able to generate placeholders to enusre that we have a
+     consistent numbering scheme for function codes between the C and C++
+     frontends, so that everything ties up in LTO.
+
+     Currently, tree-streamer-in.c:unpack_ts_function_decl_value_fields
+     validates that tree nodes returned by TARGET_BUILTIN_DECL are non-NULL and
+     some node other than error_mark_node. This is a holdover from when builtin
+     decls were streamed by code rather than by value.
+
+     Ultimately, we should be able to remove this validation of BUILT_IN_MD
+     nodes and remove the target hook. For now, however, we need to appease the
+     validation and return a non-NULL, non-error_mark_node node, so we
+     arbitrarily choose integer_zero_node.  */
+  tree decl = placeholder_p
+    ? integer_zero_node
+    : simulate_builtin_function_decl (input_location, name, fntype,
+                                     code, NULL, attrs);
 
   registered_function &rfn = *ggc_alloc <registered_function> ();
   rfn.instance = instance;
@@ -1036,7 +1053,7 @@ function_builder::add_unique_function (const 
function_instance &instance,
                                           argument_types.address ());
   tree attrs = get_attributes (instance);
   registered_function &rfn = add_function (instance, name, fntype, attrs,
-                                          required_extensions, false);
+                                          required_extensions, false, false);
 
   /* Enter the function into the hash table.  */
   hashval_t hash = instance.hash ();
@@ -1047,16 +1064,14 @@ function_builder::add_unique_function (const 
function_instance &instance,
 
   /* Also add the function under its overloaded alias, if we want
      a separate decl for each instance of an overloaded function.  */
-  if (m_direct_overloads || force_direct_overloads)
+  char *overload_name = get_name (instance, true);
+  if (strcmp (name, overload_name) != 0)
     {
-      char *overload_name = get_name (instance, true);
-      if (strcmp (name, overload_name) != 0)
-       {
-         /* Attribute lists shouldn't be shared.  */
-         tree attrs = get_attributes (instance);
-         add_function (instance, overload_name, fntype, attrs,
-                       required_extensions, false);
-       }
+      /* Attribute lists shouldn't be shared.  */
+      tree attrs = get_attributes (instance);
+      bool placeholder_p = !(m_direct_overloads || force_direct_overloads);
+      add_function (instance, overload_name, fntype, attrs,
+                   required_extensions, false, placeholder_p);
     }
 
   obstack_free (&m_string_obstack, name);
@@ -1077,18 +1092,19 @@ function_builder::add_overloaded_function (const 
function_instance &instance,
 {
   char *name = get_name (instance, true);
   if (registered_function **map_value = m_overload_names.get (name))
-    gcc_assert ((*map_value)->instance == instance
-               && ((*map_value)->required_extensions
-                   & ~required_extensions) == 0);
+    {
+      gcc_assert ((*map_value)->instance == instance
+                 && ((*map_value)->required_extensions
+                     & ~required_extensions) == 0);
+      obstack_free (&m_string_obstack, name);
+    }
   else
     {
       registered_function &rfn
        = add_function (instance, name, m_overload_type, NULL_TREE,
-                       required_extensions, true);
-      const char *permanent_name = IDENTIFIER_POINTER (DECL_NAME (rfn.decl));
-      m_overload_names.put (permanent_name, &rfn);
+                       required_extensions, true, m_direct_overloads);
+      m_overload_names.put (name, &rfn);
     }
-  obstack_free (&m_string_obstack, name);
 }
 
 /* If we are using manual overload resolution, add one function decl
@@ -1098,9 +1114,6 @@ void
 function_builder::add_overloaded_functions (const function_group_info &group,
                                            mode_suffix_index mode)
 {
-  if (m_direct_overloads)
-    return;
-
   unsigned int explicit_type0 = (*group.shape)->explicit_type_suffix_p (0);
   unsigned int explicit_type1 = (*group.shape)->explicit_type_suffix_p (1);
   for (unsigned int pi = 0; group.preds[pi] != NUM_PREDS; ++pi)
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.h 
b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.h
index 620e18841b2..b701f90ac1a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.h
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve-builtins.h
@@ -337,7 +337,8 @@ private:
   tree get_attributes (const function_instance &);
 
   registered_function &add_function (const function_instance &,
-                                    const char *, tree, tree, uint64_t, bool);
+                                    const char *, tree, tree,
+                                    uint64_t, bool, bool);
 
   /* The function type to use for functions that are resolved by
      function_resolver.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr99216.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr99216.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..61a58a7fcf4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/aarch64/sve/pr99216.C
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+/* { dg-do link { target aarch64_asm_sve_ok } } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-flto" } */
+#include <arm_sve.h>
+bool a;
+int main() { a = svaddv(svptrue_b8(), svdup_s8(0)); }

Reply via email to