On 4/12/21 1:20 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
Here we're crashing during deduction for a template placeholder from a
dependent initializer because one of the initializer's elements has an
empty TREE_TYPE, something which resolve_args and later unify_one_argument
don't expect.  And if the deduction from a dependent initializer
otherwise fails, we prematurely issue an error rather than reattempting
the deduction at instantiation time.

This patch makes do_class_deduction more tolerant about dependent
initializers, in a manner similar to what do_auto_deduction does: if
deduction from a dependent initializer fails, just return the original
placeholder unchanged.

Why doesn't the type_dependent_expression_p check in do_auto_deduction catch this already?

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, and also tested on
cmcstl2 and range-v3, and on all the testcases in PR93383, does this
look OK for trunk?

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/89565
        PR c++/93383
        PR c++/99200
        * pt.c (do_class_deduction): If an argument has no type, don't
        attempt deduction.  If deduction fails and the initializer is
        type-dependent, try again at instantiation time.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR c++/89565
        PR c++/93383
        PR c++/99200
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class39.C: Remove dg-ice.
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class44.C: New test.
        * g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class45.C: New test.
---
  gcc/cp/pt.c                                  | 11 +++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class39.C |  1 -
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class44.C | 11 +++++++
  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class45.C | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class44.C
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class45.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 0ce7fa359c1..612feac7976 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -29334,6 +29334,13 @@ do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
    else
      args = make_tree_vector_single (init);
+ /* If an argument is missing its type, we can't possibly deduce from this
+     (type-dependent) initializer ahead of time.  */
+  if (processing_template_decl)
+    for (tree arg : *args)
+      if (!TREE_TYPE (arg))
+       return ptype;
    /* Do this now to avoid problems with erroneous args later on.  */
    args = resolve_args (args, complain);
    if (args == NULL)
@@ -29419,6 +29426,10 @@ do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
if (call == error_mark_node)
      {
+      if (type_dependent_expression_p (init))
+       /* Try again at instantiation time.  */
+       return ptype;
+
        if (complain & tf_warning_or_error)
        {
          error ("class template argument deduction failed:");
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class39.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class39.C
index f5f79a71ec2..9b4da4f02ea 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class39.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class39.C
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
  // PR c++/89565
  // { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
-// { dg-ice "resolve_args" }
template <auto>
  struct N{};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class44.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class44.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d91e800424f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class44.C
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/93383
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template <int> struct A {};
+
+template <A a> struct B {
+  void foo(B<+a>);
+  void bar(B<a.x>);
+  template <class T> using type = B<T{}>;
+  template <class> static inline auto y = A{0}; // { dg-error "deduction|no 
match" }
+};
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class45.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class45.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e7addf5f291
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class45.C
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// PR c++/99200
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template <int N>
+struct A
+{
+  constexpr A (const char (&s)[N]) { for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) v[i] = s[i]; 
v[N] = 0; }
+  char v[N + 1];
+};
+
+template <A s>
+struct B
+{
+  constexpr operator const char *() { return s.v; }
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+const char *
+foo ()
+{
+  return B<__PRETTY_FUNCTION__>{};
+}
+
+template <typename T>
+const char *
+bar ()
+{
+  return B<__FUNCTION__>{};
+}
+
+auto a = foo <int> ();
+auto b = bar <double> ();


Reply via email to