On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > Note that I have included unrelated though contextually connected 6/6 as > > > an RFC to verify whether this potential anomaly I have spotted has been > > > intentional. I'll be happy to drop it if that is the case. The remaining > > > changes are I believe actual bug fixes. > > I doubt it's intentional.? I'd tend to think this specific patch in the > > series should wait until gcc-12 out of an abundance of caution. > > Makes sense to me. Since we have a working instance of patchwork and I > actively use it for patch management (for own patches anyway, as I can't > update the status of other people's patches) all I need to do is to just > get back to it once we reopen for GCC 12 and see what's been outstanding > there.
With GCC 11 out of the door I have committed this change now. Thank you, Jeff, for your review again! Maciej
