On 05/05/21 16:23 -0400, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++ wrote:
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/10/11?
Yes, thanks.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/ranges (filter_view::_Iterator::base): Make the
const& overload return a const reference and remove its
constraint as per LWG 3533. Make unconditionally noexcept.
(transform_view::_Iterator::base): Likewise.
(elements_view::_Iterator::base): Likewise.
---
libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
index 7075fa3ae6e..bc11505c167 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
@@ -1199,9 +1199,8 @@ namespace views::__adaptor
_M_parent(__parent)
{ }
- constexpr _Vp_iter
- base() const &
- requires copyable<_Vp_iter>
+ constexpr const _Vp_iter&
+ base() const & noexcept
{ return _M_current; }
constexpr _Vp_iter
@@ -1467,9 +1466,8 @@ namespace views::__adaptor
: _M_current(std::move(__i._M_current)), _M_parent(__i._M_parent)
{ }
- constexpr _Base_iter
- base() const &
- requires copyable<_Base_iter>
+ constexpr const _Base_iter&
+ base() const & noexcept
{ return _M_current; }
constexpr _Base_iter
@@ -3403,8 +3401,8 @@ namespace views::__adaptor
: _M_base(std::move(base))
{ }
- constexpr _Vp
- base() const& requires copy_constructible<_Vp>
+ constexpr const _Vp&
+ base() const & noexcept
{ return _M_base; }
constexpr _Vp
--
2.31.1.442.g7e39198978