On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 11:32, Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> wrote: > > Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> writes: > > This patch adds support for the reduc_plus_scal optab with MVE, which > > maps to the vaddv instruction. > > > > It moves the reduc_plus_scal_<mode> expander from neon.md to > > vec-common.md and adds support for MVE to it. > > > > Since vaddv uses a 32-bits accumulator, we have to truncate it's > > result. > > > > For instance: > > int32_t test__s8x16 (int8_t *a) { > > int i; > > int8_t result = 0; > > for (i=0; i<16; i++) { > > result += a[i]; > > } > > return result; > > } > > is compiled into: > > vldrb.8 q3, [r0] > > vaddv.s8 r0, q3 > > sxtb r0, r0 > > bx lr > > > > If we used uint8_t instead of int8_t, we still use vaddv.s8 r0, q3, > > but truncate with uxtb r0, r0. > > > > 2021-05-25 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> > > > > gcc/ > > * config/arm/mve.md (mve_vaddvq_<supf><mode>): Prefix with '@'. > > * config/arm/neon.md (reduc_plus_scal_<mode>): Move to .. > > * config/arm/vec-common.md: .. here. Add support for MVE. > > > > gcc/testsuite/ > > * gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vaddv-1.c: New test. > > --- > > gcc/config/arm/mve.md | 2 +- > > gcc/config/arm/neon.md | 13 ---------- > > gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ > > .../gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vaddv-1.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/simd/mve-vaddv-1.c > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md > > index 133ebe93cf3..0a6ba80c99d 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/arm/mve.md > > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/mve.md > > @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ (define_insn "mve_vclsq_s<mode>" > > ;; > > ;; [vaddvq_s, vaddvq_u]) > > ;; > > -(define_insn "mve_vaddvq_<supf><mode>" > > +(define_insn "@mve_vaddvq_<supf><mode>" > > [ > > (set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=Te") > > (unspec:SI [(match_operand:MVE_2 1 "s_register_operand" "w")] > > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md > > index 977adef5490..6a6573317cf 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/arm/neon.md > > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/neon.md > > @@ -1161,19 +1161,6 @@ (define_expand "reduc_plus_scal_<mode>" > > DONE; > > }) > > > > -(define_expand "reduc_plus_scal_<mode>" > > - [(match_operand:<V_elem> 0 "nonimmediate_operand") > > - (match_operand:VQ 1 "s_register_operand")] > > - "ARM_HAVE_NEON_<MODE>_ARITH && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN" > > -{ > > - rtx step1 = gen_reg_rtx (<V_HALF>mode); > > - > > - emit_insn (gen_quad_halves_plus<mode> (step1, operands[1])); > > - emit_insn (gen_reduc_plus_scal_<V_half> (operands[0], step1)); > > - > > - DONE; > > -}) > > - > > (define_expand "reduc_plus_scal_v2di" > > [(match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand") > > (match_operand:V2DI 1 "s_register_operand")] > > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md > > index e8b2901b006..cc136e2865f 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md > > +++ b/gcc/config/arm/vec-common.md > > @@ -539,3 +539,29 @@ (define_expand "vec_store_lanesxi<mode>" > > emit_insn (gen_mve_vst4q<mode> (operands[0], operands[1])); > > DONE; > > }) > > + > > +(define_expand "reduc_plus_scal_<mode>" > > + [(match_operand:<V_elem> 0 "nonimmediate_operand") > > + (match_operand:VQ 1 "s_register_operand")] > > + "ARM_HAVE_NEON_<MODE>_ARITH || (TARGET_HAVE_MVE && <MODE>mode != > > V4SFmode) > > + && !TARGET_REALLY_IWMMXT > > + && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN" > > This might be better as: > > "ARM_HAVE_<MODE>_ARITH > && !(TARGET_HAVE_MVE && FLOAT_MODE_P (<MODE>mode)) > && !BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN" > > just in case the iterator gets expanded for Neon in future. > The TARGET_REALLY_IWMMXT test shouldn't be needed.
Indeed. I got used to adding it after several bug reports related to my previous MVE patches when using iwmmxt... > > > +{ > > + if (TARGET_NEON) > > + { > > + rtx step1 = gen_reg_rtx (<V_HALF>mode); > > + > > + emit_insn (gen_quad_halves_plus<mode> (step1, operands[1])); > > + emit_insn (gen_reduc_plus_scal_<V_half> (operands[0], step1)); > > + } > > + else > > + { > > + /* vaddv generates a 32 bits accumulator. */ > > + rtx op0 = gen_reg_rtx (SImode); > > + > > + emit_insn (gen_mve_vaddvq (VADDVQ_S, <MODE>mode, op0, operands[1])); > > + emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (operands[0], gen_rtx_SUBREG (<V_elem>mode, > > op0, 0))); > > This last line should be: > > emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_lowpart (<V_elem>mode, op0)); > > OK with those changes, thanks. Thanks, pushed. > > Richard