on 2021/7/15 上午3:32, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> TBH, 79 vs. 80 isn't normally something I'd worry about when reviewing >> new code. But I know in the past people have asked for 79 to be used >> for the “end+1” reason, so I don't think we should “fix” existing code >> that honours the 79 limit so that it no longer does, especially when the >> lines surrounding the code aren't changing. > > The normal rule is you cannot go over 80. It is perfectly fine to have > shorter lines, certainly if that is nice for some other reason, so > automatically (by some tool) changing this is Just Wrong. >
OK, could this be applied to changelog entry too? I guess yes? BR, Kewen
