Hi,

Sorry It looks like I forgot to ask if OK for backport to GCC 9, 10, 11 after 
some stew.

Thanks,
Tamar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 7:11 PM
> To: Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; nd <n...@arm.com>; Richard Earnshaw
> <richard.earns...@arm.com>; Marcus Shawcroft
> <marcus.shawcr...@arm.com>; Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4]AArch64: correct dot-product RTL patterns for
> aarch64.
> 
> Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> writes:
> > Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
> >
> > Ok for master?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tamar
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >     * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd-builtins.def (sdot, udot): Rename to..
> >     (sdot_prod, udot_prod): ... This.
> >     * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (aarch64_<sur>dot<vsi2qi>):
> Merged
> >     into...
> >     (<sur>dot_prod<vsi2qi>): ... this.
> >     (aarch64_<sur>dot_lane<vsi2qi>, aarch64_<sur>dot_laneq<vsi2qi>):
> >     Change operands order.
> >     (<sur>sadv16qi): Use new operands order.
> >     * config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vdot_u32, vdotq_u32, vdot_s32,
> >     vdotq_s32): Use new RTL ordering.
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 
> Richard

Reply via email to