On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:19 AM Andreas Krebbel <kreb...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/28/21 9:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 8:44 AM Andreas Krebbel via Gcc-patches
> > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> There are also memory operands passed for in0 and in1.
> >>
> >> Ok for mainline?
> >
> > They can also be constant vectors, I'd just not specify the operand
> > kind - usually
> > expanders are not limited as to what they feed down.
>
> Right, I'll just replace "registers" with "operands" then. Ok?
OK.
Richard.
> also to emit such a permutation. In the former case @var{in0}, @var{in1}\n\
> and @var{out} are all null. In the latter case @var{in0} and @var{in1}
> are\n\
> the source vectors and @var{out} is the destination vector; all three are\n\
> -registers of mode @var{mode}. @var{in1} is the same as @var{in0} if\n\
> +operands of mode @var{mode}. @var{in1} is the same as @var{in0} if\n\
> @var{sel} describes a permutation on one vector instead of two.\n\
> \n\
> Return true if the operation is possible, emitting instructions for it\n\
>
> Andreas
