Hi All,

I believe PR101750 to be a testism. The reduced case accesses h[0] but h is
uninitialized and so the changes added in r12-2523 makes the compiler realize
this and replaces the code with a trap.

This fixes the case by just making the variable static.

regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.

Ok for master?

Thanks,
Tamar

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR tree-optimization/101750
        * g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc: Fix access of h.

--- inline copy of patch -- 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc
index 
00ebe9d9cdf600ada8e66b4b854f0e18ad0b6a7d..4b885a5d432130d5eff3e96c833ec6c97de3e95d
 100755
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ public:
   a operator*(a d) { return a(b * b - c * c, b * c + c * d.b); }
 };
 int f, g;
-class {
-  a *h;
+class mp {
+  static a *h;
   a *i;
 
 public:


-- 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc
index 00ebe9d9cdf600ada8e66b4b854f0e18ad0b6a7d..4b885a5d432130d5eff3e96c833ec6c97de3e95d 100755
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/pr99149.cc
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ public:
   a operator*(a d) { return a(b * b - c * c, b * c + c * d.b); }
 };
 int f, g;
-class {
-  a *h;
+class mp {
+  static a *h;
   a *i;
 
 public:

Reply via email to