On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Georg-Johann Lay <a...@gjlay.de> wrote: > Martin Jambor wrote: >> Hi, >> >> PR 51782 showed that COMPONENT_REFs created by SRA got expanded with a >> wrong address space because the address space was not specified in the >> type of the whole tree. This is however inconsistent with how we >> encode address spaces in MEM_REFs where they are supposed to be stored >> in the type of its address operand (as opposed to the type of the >> reference). Therefore the following patch changes the expansion to >> always look at the base address and look through MEM_REFs if >> necessary. >> >> It fixes the issue for me on a cross compiler, a bootstrap and >> testsuite run on x86_64-linux showed only regressions described in PR >> 52297 so I consider it successful. My understanding is that Richi >> approved it in bugzilla. Georg-Johann Lay said he would test it on HW >> or simulator that actually uses address spaces and he has also already >> committed a testcase for this bug. Therefore I intend to commit the >> patch if his tests pass too. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Martin > > The avr test suite has passed now, okay from that side.
And indeed the patch is ok from my side as well. Thanks, Richard. > Johann
