On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 06:00:50PM +0800, Hongtao Liu wrote: > And I find paradoxical subreg like (subreg:V4SF (reg:SF)) are not > allowed by validate_subreg until r11-621.
My reading of the r11-621 change is that it allowed (subreg:V4SF (reg:V2SF) 0) but that (subreg:V4SF (reg:SF) 0) has been valid even before that. In any case, the PR89984 fix was a missed-optimization fix, so we don't need to backport that and thus don't need to backport the follow-up patch either. Jakub