On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 8:12 PM Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbg...@lug-owl.de> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> While mass-building a cross-gcc, I noticed that for
> alpha-dec-vms/alpha64-dec-vms, recent GCC versions correctly throw a warning
> due to a multi-statement define that gets rippen in an if/else case:
>
> [all 2021-09-12 15:51:55] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -fno-PIE -c -g -O2
> -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
> -Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag -Wmissing-format-attribute
> -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
> -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
> -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc/gcc/../include
> -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcody
> -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd
> -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -o value-prof.o -MT
> value-prof.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/value-prof.TPo ../../gcc/gcc/value-prof.c
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:01] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -fno-PIE -c -g -O2
> -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
> -Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag -Wmissing-format-attribute
> -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
> -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
> -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/. -I../../gcc/gcc/../include
> -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcody
> -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd
> -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -o var-tracking.o -MT
> var-tracking.o -MMD -MP -MF ./.deps/var-tracking.TPo
> ../../gcc/gcc/var-tracking.c
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] In file included from ./tm.h:21,
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] from ../../gcc/gcc/backend.h:28,
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] from
> ../../gcc/gcc/var-tracking.c:91:
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] ../../gcc/gcc/var-tracking.c: In function 'void
> prepare_call_arguments(basic_block, rtx_insn*)':
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] ../../gcc/gcc/config/alpha/vms.h:148:3: error:
> macro expands to multiple statements [-Werror=multistatement-macros]
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] 148 | (CUM).num_args = 0;
> \
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] | ^
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] ../../gcc/gcc/var-tracking.c:6334:17: note: in
> expansion of macro 'INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS'
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] 6334 | INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS
> (args_so_far_v, type, NULL_RTX, fndecl,
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] ../../gcc/gcc/var-tracking.c:6332:15: note: some
> parts of macro expansion are not guarded by this 'else' clause
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] 6332 | else
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:03] | ^~~~
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:20] cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:20] make[1]: *** [Makefile:1143: var-tracking.o] Error 1
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:20] make[1]: Leaving directory
> '/var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-alpha64-dec-vms/8/toolchain-build/gcc'
> [all 2021-09-12 15:52:20] make: *** [Makefile:4425: all-gcc] Error 2
>
>
>
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/alpha/vms.h (INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS): Wrap multi-statment
> define into a block.
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/alpha/vms.h b/gcc/config/alpha/vms.h
> index b8673b6b6fb..e979aef10c7 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/alpha/vms.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/alpha/vms.h
> @@ -145,9 +145,13 @@ typedef struct {int num_args; enum avms_arg_type
> atypes[6];} avms_arg_info;
>
> #undef INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS
> #define INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS(CUM, FNTYPE, LIBNAME, INDIRECT, N_NAMED_ARGS) \
> - (CUM).num_args = 0; \
> - (CUM).atypes[0] = (CUM).atypes[1] = (CUM).atypes[2] = I64; \
> - (CUM).atypes[3] = (CUM).atypes[4] = (CUM).atypes[5] = I64;
> + do \
> + { \
> + (CUM).num_args = 0; \
> + (CUM).atypes[0] = (CUM).atypes[1] = (CUM).atypes[2] = I64; \
> + (CUM).atypes[3] = (CUM).atypes[4] = (CUM).atypes[5] = I64; \
> + } \
> + while (0)
>
> #define DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN 0
>
>
>
>
> Okay for trunk?
OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Jan-Benedict
>
> --
