On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:16:24AM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > On 9/20/21 11:24, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > This patch implements the rawmemchr expander as introduced in > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579649.html > > > > Bootstrapped and regtested in conjunction with the patch from above on > > IBM Z. Ok for mainline? > > > > > From 551362cda54048dc1a51588112f11c070ed52020 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefa...@linux.ibm.com> > > Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:35:39 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] IBM Z: Provide rawmemchr{qi,hi,si} expander > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * config/s390/s390-protos.h (s390_rawmemchrqi): Add prototype. > > (s390_rawmemchrhi): Add prototype. > > (s390_rawmemchrsi): Add prototype. > > * config/s390/s390.c (s390_rawmemchr): New function. > > (s390_rawmemchrqi): New function. > > (s390_rawmemchrhi): New function. > > (s390_rawmemchrsi): New function. > > * config/s390/s390.md (rawmemchr<SINT:mode>): New expander. > > (rawmemchr<SINT:mode><P:mode>): New expander. > > * config/s390/vector.md (vec_vfees<mode>): Basically a copy of > > the pattern vfees<mode> from vx-builtins.md. > > * config/s390/vx-builtins.md (*vfees<mode>): Remove. > > Thanks! Would it make sense to also extend the strlen and movstr expanders > we have to support the additional character modes?
For strlen-like loops over non-character arrays the current implementation in the loop distribution pass uses rawmemchr<MODE> and computes pointer difference in order to compute the length. Thus we get strlen<MODE> for free and don't need to reimplement it. > > A few style comments below. > > > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > * gcc.target/s390/rawmemchr-1.c: New test. > > --- > > gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h | 4 + > > gcc/config/s390/s390.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++ > > gcc/config/s390/s390.md | 20 +++++ > > gcc/config/s390/vector.md | 26 ++++++ > > gcc/config/s390/vx-builtins.md | 26 ------ > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/rawmemchr-1.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++ > > 6 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/rawmemchr-1.c > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h b/gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h > > index 4b03c6e99f5..0d9619e8254 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h > > +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h > > @@ -66,6 +66,10 @@ s390_asm_declare_function_size (FILE *asm_out_file, > > const char *fnname ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, tree decl); > > #endif > > > > +extern void s390_rawmemchrqi(rtx dst, rtx src, rtx pat); > > +extern void s390_rawmemchrhi(rtx dst, rtx src, rtx pat); > > +extern void s390_rawmemchrsi(rtx dst, rtx src, rtx pat); > > + > > #ifdef RTX_CODE > > extern int s390_extra_constraint_str (rtx, int, const char *); > > extern int s390_const_ok_for_constraint_p (HOST_WIDE_INT, int, const char > > *); > > diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.c b/gcc/config/s390/s390.c > > index 54dd6332c3a..1435ce156e2 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.c > > +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.c > > @@ -16559,6 +16559,95 @@ s390_excess_precision (enum excess_precision_type > > type) > > } > > #endif > > > > +template <machine_mode vec_mode, > > + machine_mode elt_mode, > > + rtx (*gen_vec_vfees) (rtx, rtx, rtx, rtx)> > > +static void > > +s390_rawmemchr(rtx dst, rtx src, rtx pat) { > > I think it would be a bit easier to turn the vec_vfees expander into a > 'parameterized name' and add the mode as parameter. I'll attach a patch > to illustrate how this might look like. Right, didn't know about parameterized names which looks more clean to me. Thanks for the hint! > > > + rtx lens = gen_reg_rtx (V16QImode); > > + rtx pattern = gen_reg_rtx (vec_mode); > > + rtx loop_start = gen_label_rtx (); > > + rtx loop_end = gen_label_rtx (); > > + rtx addr = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode); > > + rtx offset = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode); > > + rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode); > > + rtx loadlen = gen_reg_rtx (SImode); > > + rtx matchlen = gen_reg_rtx (SImode); > > + rtx mem; > > + > > + pat = GEN_INT (trunc_int_for_mode (INTVAL (pat), elt_mode)); > > + emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (pattern, gen_rtx_VEC_DUPLICATE (vec_mode, pat))); > > + > > + emit_move_insn (addr, XEXP (src, 0)); > > + > > + // alignment > > + emit_insn (gen_vlbb (lens, gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, addr), GEN_INT (6))); > > + emit_insn (gen_lcbb (loadlen, addr, GEN_INT (6))); > > + lens = convert_to_mode (vec_mode, lens, 1); > > + emit_insn (gen_vec_vfees (lens, lens, pattern, GEN_INT (0))); > > + lens = convert_to_mode (V4SImode, lens, 1); > > + emit_insn (gen_vec_extractv4sisi (matchlen, lens, GEN_INT (1))); > > + lens = convert_to_mode (vec_mode, lens, 1); > > That back and forth NOP conversion stuff is ugly but I couldn't find a > more elegant way to write this without generating worse code. Of > course we want to benefit here from the fact that the result operand > of vfees is already zero-extended. Perhaps factor this out into a > utility function or an extra expander because we appear to need this > frequently?! Not a requirement for this patch though. I completely agree with this, though, I couldn't find an elegant way either. I will keep this in mind in the hope to find a more elegant solution someday. > > > + emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (matchlen, loadlen, LT, NULL_RTX, SImode, 1, > > loop_end); > > + force_expand_binop (Pmode, and_optab, addr, GEN_INT (15), tmp, 1, > > OPTAB_DIRECT); > > + force_expand_binop (Pmode, sub_optab, GEN_INT (16), tmp, tmp, 1, > > OPTAB_DIRECT); > > + force_expand_binop (Pmode, add_optab, addr, tmp, addr, 1, OPTAB_DIRECT); > > Couldn't we just do this as '(addr + 16) & ~0xf' here? > Something like this perhaps: > force_expand_binop (Pmode, add_optab, addr, GEN_INT(16), addr, 1, > OPTAB_DIRECT); > force_expand_binop (Pmode, and_optab, addr, > GEN_INT(~HOST_WIDE_INT_UC(0xf)), addr, 1, OPTAB_DIRECT); Good point. Changed it. > > > + // now, addr is 16-byte aligned > > + > > + mem = gen_rtx_MEM (vec_mode, addr); > > + set_mem_align (mem, 128); > > + emit_move_insn (lens, mem); > > + emit_insn (gen_vec_vfees (lens, lens, pattern, GEN_INT > > (VSTRING_FLAG_CS))); > > + add_int_reg_note (s390_emit_ccraw_jump (4, EQ, loop_end), > > + REG_BR_PROB, > > + profile_probability::very_unlikely ().to_reg_br_prob_note > > ()); > > + > > + emit_label (loop_start); > > + LABEL_NUSES (loop_start) = 1; > > + > > + force_expand_binop (Pmode, add_optab, addr, GEN_INT (16), addr, 1, > > OPTAB_DIRECT); > > + mem = gen_rtx_MEM (vec_mode, addr); > > + set_mem_align (mem, 128); > > + emit_move_insn (lens, mem); > > + emit_insn (gen_vec_vfees (lens, lens, pattern, GEN_INT > > (VSTRING_FLAG_CS))); > > + add_int_reg_note (s390_emit_ccraw_jump (4, NE, loop_start), > > + REG_BR_PROB, > > + profile_probability::very_likely ().to_reg_br_prob_note ()); > > + > > + emit_label (loop_end); > > + LABEL_NUSES (loop_end) = 1; > > + > > + if (TARGET_64BIT) > > + { > > + lens = convert_to_mode (V2DImode, lens, 1); > > + emit_insn (gen_vec_extractv2didi (offset, lens, GEN_INT (0))); > > + } > > + else > > + { > > + lens = convert_to_mode (V4SImode, lens, 1); > > + emit_insn (gen_vec_extractv4sisi (offset, lens, GEN_INT (1))); > > + } > > + force_expand_binop (Pmode, add_optab, addr, offset, dst, 1, > > OPTAB_DIRECT); > > +} > > + > > +void > > +s390_rawmemchrqi (rtx dst, rtx src, rtx pat) > > +{ > > + s390_rawmemchr<V16QImode, QImode, gen_vec_vfeesv16qi> (dst, src, pat); > > +} > > + > > +void > > +s390_rawmemchrhi (rtx dst, rtx src, rtx pat) > > +{ > > + s390_rawmemchr<V8HImode, HImode, gen_vec_vfeesv8hi> (dst, src, pat); > > +} > > + > > +void > > +s390_rawmemchrsi (rtx dst, rtx src, rtx pat) > > +{ > > + s390_rawmemchr<V4SImode, SImode, gen_vec_vfeesv4si> (dst, src, pat); > > +} > > + > > /* Implement the TARGET_ASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET hook. */ > > > > static unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT > > diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.md b/gcc/config/s390/s390.md > > index 1b894a926ce..f81bcef86ce 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.md > > +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.md > > @@ -12258,3 +12258,23 @@ > > UNSPECV_PPA)] > > "TARGET_ZEC12" > > "") > > + > > +(define_expand "rawmemchr<SINT:mode>" > > + [(match_operand 0 "register_operand") > > + (match_operand 1 "memory_operand") > > + (match_operand:SINT 2 "const_int_operand")] > > + "TARGET_VX" > > +{ > > + if (TARGET_64BIT) > > + emit_insn (gen_rawmemchr<SINT:mode>di (operands[0], operands[1], > > operands[2])); > > + else > > + emit_insn (gen_rawmemchr<SINT:mode>si (operands[0], operands[1], > > operands[2])); > > + DONE; > > +}) > > Couldn't you just invoke s390_rawmemchr from here instead of the > indirection through a separate expander? Yea, right. Changed it. Please find a new version attached. I did another bootstrap+regtest on IBM Z. Ok for mainline? Thanks for your detailed review! Cheers, Stefan
>From 04184da07cc3570d03d90feb1017e377aeea53bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus <stefa...@linux.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 10:35:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] IBM Z: Provide rawmemchr{qi,hi,si} expander gcc/ChangeLog: * config/s390/s390-protos.h (s390_rawmemchr): Add prototype. * config/s390/s390.c (s390_rawmemchr): New function. * config/s390/s390.md (rawmemchr<SINT:mode>): New expander. * config/s390/vector.md (@vec_vfees<mode>): Basically a copy of the pattern vfees<mode> from vx-builtins.md. * config/s390/vx-builtins.md (*vfees<mode>): Remove. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/s390/rawmemchr-1.c: New test. --- gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h | 2 + gcc/config/s390/s390.c | 69 ++++++++++++++ gcc/config/s390/s390.md | 7 ++ gcc/config/s390/vector.md | 26 ++++++ gcc/config/s390/vx-builtins.md | 26 ------ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/rawmemchr-1.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/rawmemchr-1.c diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h b/gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h index 4b03c6e99f5..c1616357b8c 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390-protos.h @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ s390_asm_declare_function_size (FILE *asm_out_file, const char *fnname ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, tree decl); #endif +extern void s390_rawmemchr (machine_mode elt_mode, rtx dst, rtx src, rtx pat); + #ifdef RTX_CODE extern int s390_extra_constraint_str (rtx, int, const char *); extern int s390_const_ok_for_constraint_p (HOST_WIDE_INT, int, const char *); diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.c b/gcc/config/s390/s390.c index e04385451cf..dae8bb3cbbd 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.c +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.c @@ -16569,6 +16569,75 @@ s390_excess_precision (enum excess_precision_type type) } #endif +void +s390_rawmemchr (machine_mode elt_mode, rtx dst, rtx src, rtx pat) +{ + machine_mode vec_mode = mode_for_vector (as_a <scalar_int_mode> (elt_mode), + 16 / GET_MODE_SIZE (elt_mode)).require(); + rtx lens = gen_reg_rtx (V16QImode); + rtx pattern = gen_reg_rtx (vec_mode); + rtx loop_start = gen_label_rtx (); + rtx loop_end = gen_label_rtx (); + rtx addr = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode); + rtx offset = gen_reg_rtx (Pmode); + rtx loadlen = gen_reg_rtx (SImode); + rtx matchlen = gen_reg_rtx (SImode); + rtx mem; + + pat = GEN_INT (trunc_int_for_mode (INTVAL (pat), elt_mode)); + emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (pattern, gen_rtx_VEC_DUPLICATE (vec_mode, pat))); + + emit_move_insn (addr, XEXP (src, 0)); + + // alignment + emit_insn (gen_vlbb (lens, gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, addr), GEN_INT (6))); + emit_insn (gen_lcbb (loadlen, addr, GEN_INT (6))); + lens = convert_to_mode (vec_mode, lens, 1); + emit_insn (gen_vec_vfees (vec_mode, lens, lens, pattern, GEN_INT (0))); + lens = convert_to_mode (V4SImode, lens, 1); + emit_insn (gen_vec_extractv4sisi (matchlen, lens, GEN_INT (1))); + lens = convert_to_mode (vec_mode, lens, 1); + emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (matchlen, loadlen, LT, NULL_RTX, SImode, 1, loop_end); + force_expand_binop (Pmode, add_optab, addr, GEN_INT(16), addr, 1, OPTAB_DIRECT); + force_expand_binop (Pmode, and_optab, addr, GEN_INT(~HOST_WIDE_INT_UC(0xf)), addr, 1, OPTAB_DIRECT); + // now, addr is 16-byte aligned + + mem = gen_rtx_MEM (vec_mode, addr); + set_mem_align (mem, 128); + emit_move_insn (lens, mem); + emit_insn (gen_vec_vfees (vec_mode, lens, lens, pattern, GEN_INT (VSTRING_FLAG_CS))); + add_int_reg_note (s390_emit_ccraw_jump (4, EQ, loop_end), + REG_BR_PROB, + profile_probability::very_unlikely ().to_reg_br_prob_note ()); + + emit_label (loop_start); + LABEL_NUSES (loop_start) = 1; + + force_expand_binop (Pmode, add_optab, addr, GEN_INT (16), addr, 1, OPTAB_DIRECT); + mem = gen_rtx_MEM (vec_mode, addr); + set_mem_align (mem, 128); + emit_move_insn (lens, mem); + emit_insn (gen_vec_vfees (vec_mode, lens, lens, pattern, GEN_INT (VSTRING_FLAG_CS))); + add_int_reg_note (s390_emit_ccraw_jump (4, NE, loop_start), + REG_BR_PROB, + profile_probability::very_likely ().to_reg_br_prob_note ()); + + emit_label (loop_end); + LABEL_NUSES (loop_end) = 1; + + if (TARGET_64BIT) + { + lens = convert_to_mode (V2DImode, lens, 1); + emit_insn (gen_vec_extractv2didi (offset, lens, GEN_INT (0))); + } + else + { + lens = convert_to_mode (V4SImode, lens, 1); + emit_insn (gen_vec_extractv4sisi (offset, lens, GEN_INT (1))); + } + force_expand_binop (Pmode, add_optab, addr, offset, dst, 1, OPTAB_DIRECT); +} + /* Implement the TARGET_ASAN_SHADOW_OFFSET hook. */ static unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/s390.md b/gcc/config/s390/s390.md index 1b894a926ce..b8bdbaec468 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/s390.md +++ b/gcc/config/s390/s390.md @@ -12258,3 +12258,10 @@ UNSPECV_PPA)] "TARGET_ZEC12" "") + +(define_expand "rawmemchr<SINT:mode>" + [(match_operand 0 "register_operand") + (match_operand 1 "memory_operand") + (match_operand:SINT 2 "const_int_operand")] + "TARGET_VX" + "s390_rawmemchr(<SINT:MODE>mode, operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]); DONE;") diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/vector.md b/gcc/config/s390/vector.md index 70274a6ab70..1ed1d0665d4 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/vector.md +++ b/gcc/config/s390/vector.md @@ -1988,6 +1988,32 @@ "vll\t%v0,%1,%2" [(set_attr "op_type" "VRS")]) +; vfeebs, vfeehs, vfeefs +; vfeezbs, vfeezhs, vfeezfs +(define_insn "@vec_vfees<mode>" + [(set (match_operand:VI_HW_QHS 0 "register_operand" "=v") + (unspec:VI_HW_QHS [(match_operand:VI_HW_QHS 1 "register_operand" "v") + (match_operand:VI_HW_QHS 2 "register_operand" "v") + (match_operand:QI 3 "const_mask_operand" "C")] + UNSPEC_VEC_VFEE)) + (set (reg:CCRAW CC_REGNUM) + (unspec:CCRAW [(match_dup 1) + (match_dup 2) + (match_dup 3)] + UNSPEC_VEC_VFEECC))] + "TARGET_VX" +{ + unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT flags = UINTVAL (operands[3]); + + gcc_assert (!(flags & ~(VSTRING_FLAG_ZS | VSTRING_FLAG_CS))); + flags &= ~VSTRING_FLAG_CS; + + if (flags == VSTRING_FLAG_ZS) + return "vfeez<bhfgq>s\t%v0,%v1,%v2"; + return "vfee<bhfgq>s\t%v0,%v1,%v2"; +} + [(set_attr "op_type" "VRR")]) + ; vfenebs, vfenehs, vfenefs ; vfenezbs, vfenezhs, vfenezfs (define_insn "vec_vfenes<mode>" diff --git a/gcc/config/s390/vx-builtins.md b/gcc/config/s390/vx-builtins.md index 3e7b8541887..efa77992f31 100644 --- a/gcc/config/s390/vx-builtins.md +++ b/gcc/config/s390/vx-builtins.md @@ -1366,32 +1366,6 @@ ; Vector find element equal -; vfeebs, vfeehs, vfeefs -; vfeezbs, vfeezhs, vfeezfs -(define_insn "*vfees<mode>" - [(set (match_operand:VI_HW_QHS 0 "register_operand" "=v") - (unspec:VI_HW_QHS [(match_operand:VI_HW_QHS 1 "register_operand" "v") - (match_operand:VI_HW_QHS 2 "register_operand" "v") - (match_operand:QI 3 "const_mask_operand" "C")] - UNSPEC_VEC_VFEE)) - (set (reg:CCRAW CC_REGNUM) - (unspec:CCRAW [(match_dup 1) - (match_dup 2) - (match_dup 3)] - UNSPEC_VEC_VFEECC))] - "TARGET_VX" -{ - unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT flags = UINTVAL (operands[3]); - - gcc_assert (!(flags & ~(VSTRING_FLAG_ZS | VSTRING_FLAG_CS))); - flags &= ~VSTRING_FLAG_CS; - - if (flags == VSTRING_FLAG_ZS) - return "vfeez<bhfgq>s\t%v0,%v1,%v2"; - return "vfee<bhfgq>s\t%v0,%v1,%v2,%b3"; -} - [(set_attr "op_type" "VRR")]) - ; vfeeb, vfeeh, vfeef (define_insn "vfee<mode>" [(set (match_operand:VI_HW_QHS 0 "register_operand" "=v") diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/rawmemchr-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/rawmemchr-1.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a5125702315 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/rawmemchr-1.c @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ +/* { dg-do run } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -ftree-loop-distribution -fdump-tree-ldist-details -mzarch -march=z13" } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "generated rawmemchrQI" 2 "ldist" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "generated rawmemchrHI" 2 "ldist" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "generated rawmemchrSI" 2 "ldist" } } */ + +#include <string.h> +#include <assert.h> +#include <stdint.h> +#include <stdlib.h> + +#define rawmemchrT(T, pattern) \ +__attribute__((noinline,noclone)) \ +T* rawmemchr_##T (T *s) \ +{ \ + while (*s != pattern) \ + ++s; \ + return s; \ +} + +rawmemchrT(int8_t, (int8_t)0xde) +rawmemchrT(uint8_t, 0xde) +rawmemchrT(int16_t, (int16_t)0xdead) +rawmemchrT(uint16_t, 0xdead) +rawmemchrT(int32_t, (int32_t)0xdeadbeef) +rawmemchrT(uint32_t, 0xdeadbeef) + +#define runT(T, pattern) \ +void run_##T () \ +{ \ + T *buf = malloc (4096 * 2 * sizeof(T)); \ + assert (buf != NULL); \ + memset (buf, 0xa, 4096 * 2 * sizeof(T)); \ + /* ensure q is 4096-byte aligned */ \ + T *q = (T*)((unsigned char *)buf \ + + (4096 - ((uintptr_t)buf & 4095))); \ + T *p; \ + /* unaligned + block boundary + 1st load */ \ + p = (T *) ((uintptr_t)q - 8); \ + p[2] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&p[0]) == &p[2])); \ + p[2] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + /* unaligned + block boundary + 2nd load */ \ + p = (T *) ((uintptr_t)q - 8); \ + p[6] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&p[0]) == &p[6])); \ + p[6] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + /* unaligned + 1st load */ \ + q[5] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&q[2]) == &q[5])); \ + q[5] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + /* unaligned + 2nd load */ \ + q[14] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&q[2]) == &q[14])); \ + q[14] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + /* unaligned + 3rd load */ \ + q[19] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&q[2]) == &q[19])); \ + q[19] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + /* unaligned + 4th load */ \ + q[25] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&q[2]) == &q[25])); \ + q[25] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + /* aligned + 1st load */ \ + q[5] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&q[0]) == &q[5])); \ + q[5] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + /* aligned + 2nd load */ \ + q[14] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&q[0]) == &q[14])); \ + q[14] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + /* aligned + 3rd load */ \ + q[19] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&q[0]) == &q[19])); \ + q[19] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + /* aligned + 4th load */ \ + q[25] = pattern; \ + assert ((rawmemchr_##T (&q[0]) == &q[25])); \ + q[25] = (T) 0xaaaaaaaa; \ + free (buf); \ +} + +runT(int8_t, (int8_t)0xde) +runT(uint8_t, 0xde) +runT(int16_t, (int16_t)0xdead) +runT(uint16_t, 0xdead) +runT(int32_t, (int32_t)0xdeadbeef) +runT(uint32_t, 0xdeadbeef) + +int main (void) +{ + run_uint8_t (); + run_int8_t (); + run_uint16_t (); + run_int16_t (); + run_uint32_t (); + run_int32_t (); + return 0; +} -- 2.31.1