Am 02.11.21 um 14:26 schrieb Thomas Koenig: > Hi Manfred, > >> In addition to the patches of Steve Kargl for PR 91497: >> The MIN1 and MAX1 intrinsics do explicit type conversions and should >> be silenced too for -Wconversion and -Wconversion-extra. >> >> Adjust testcase to only use *4 and *8 real types, provide a second >> testcase for *10 and *16 precisions. > Two points: > > We should modify existing test cases only when necessary, because > modification can impede a regression test. It is better to create > a new one. >
Yes, but this was a quick-and-dirty test of mine, and I realized only afterwards that Steve had used it as-is. The new testcase is more consistent and more complete. Sandra got errors on targets without REAL(16) support and requested changes, so I decided to split it. So you want me to "split" it in 3 parts? - existing test as is, only for targets with REAL(16) support - additional tests incl. complex intrinsics for targets with REAL(16) support - additional tests incl. complex intrinsics for all targets, only single and double precision OTOH, it is perhaps not worth the trouble to do REAL(10) and REAL(16) tests, either it warns or it does not. > While we do recognize real*4 and real*8 and so on, these are > non-standard extensions, and I would like to avoid to have these > with new test cases. > > Instead of real*8, you can use real(8) or double precision. > Well, double precision is deprecated AFAIK. > OK with these changes to the test cases. > > Thanks for the patch! > > Best regards > > Thomas
