Benjamin De Kosnik <> writes:

>> I was surprised to see GLIBCXX_3.4.15 symbols added, but then realized
>> you added the complete set so this seems fine. 
> I meant to say: surprised to see GLIBCXX_3.4.16 symbols added, but then
> you the complete set so this seems fine. So the only added symbols are
> the complete set of GLIBCXX_3.4.16 and then the usual GLIBCXX_3.4.17
> ones. Looks good.

Right: as I mentioned in PR libstdc++/52456, when I ran a mainline
bootstrap before I'd checked in the new baselines, I got abi_check FAILs
for the GLIBCXX_3.4.16 symbols which of course were not in the Solaris
baselines from GCC 4.6.0.


Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University

Reply via email to