On 01/12/2021 14.17, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 12:08 PM Rasmus Villemoes <r...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> > wrote: >> >> The transposition nolto -> notlo is confusing and it makes the long >> name even harder to read than it already is - I kept reading it as >> "not lo" until I realized it was a simply typo. >> >> Fixes: 5269b24605b1 (Silence warning in LTO mode on VxWorks) > > Hmm, if we ever released GCC with that lto-plugin behavior you should preserve > accepting -linker-output-auto-notlo-rel in lto-plugin because a newer > lto-plugin > is required to work with older released GCC which continue to provide > the option with the spelling mistake.
I thought a given version of gcc would only use the plugin it shipped with(?). And even if in theory one should keep the plugin compatible with older gcc releases, in this case it is only relevant to vxworks ports, so if Eric and Olivier are ok with this as-is, perhaps we can avoid having to accept both spellings forever. Rasmus
