Hi,
  This patch modifies the combine pattern with a helper - 
change_pseudo_and_mask when recog fails.
The helper converts a single pseudo to the pseudo AND with a mask if the outer 
operator is IOR/XOR/PLUS
and the inner operator is ASHIFT/LSHIFTRT/AND. The conversion helps on shift + 
ior pattern.

  Not sure if the helper should be a target hook or not. Please advice.

  Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux BE and LE with no regressions. Is 
this okay for trunk?
Any recommendations? Thanks a lot.

ChangeLog
2021-12-07 Haochen Gui <guih...@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/
        * combine.c (change_pseudo_and_mask): New.
        (recog_for_combine): If recog fails, try again with the pattern
        modified by change_pseudo_and_mask.
        * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (plus_ior_xor): Removed.
        (anonymous split pattern for plus_ior_xor): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/
        * gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c: Modify dump check conditions.
        * gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c: Likewise.

patch.diff
diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
index 03e9a780919..53500e8c6a0 100644
--- a/gcc/combine.c
+++ b/gcc/combine.c
@@ -11539,6 +11539,36 @@ change_zero_ext (rtx pat)
   return changed;
 }

+/* When the outer code of set_src is IOR/XOR/PLUS and the inner code is
+   ASHIFT/LSHIFTRT/AND, convert a pseudo to psuedo AND with a mask if its
+   nonzero_bits is less than its mode mask.  The nonzero_bits in other pass
+   doesn't return the same value as it does in combine pass.  */
+static bool
+change_pseudo_and_mask (rtx pat)
+{
+  rtx src = SET_SRC (pat);
+  if ((GET_CODE (src) == IOR
+       || GET_CODE (src) == XOR
+       || GET_CODE (src) == PLUS)
+      && (((GET_CODE (XEXP (src, 0)) == ASHIFT
+           || GET_CODE (XEXP (src, 0)) == LSHIFTRT
+           || GET_CODE (XEXP (src, 0)) == AND)
+          && REG_P (XEXP (src, 1)))))
+    {
+      rtx *reg = &XEXP (SET_SRC (pat), 1);
+      machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (*reg);
+      unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT nonzero = nonzero_bits (*reg, mode);
+      if (nonzero < GET_MODE_MASK (mode))
+       {
+         rtx x = gen_rtx_AND (mode, *reg, GEN_INT (nonzero));
+         SUBST (*reg, x);
+         maybe_swap_commutative_operands (SET_SRC (pat));
+         return true;
+       }
+     }
+  return false;
+}
+
 /* Like recog, but we receive the address of a pointer to a new pattern.
    We try to match the rtx that the pointer points to.
    If that fails, we may try to modify or replace the pattern,
@@ -11586,7 +11616,10 @@ recog_for_combine (rtx *pnewpat, rtx_insn *insn, rtx 
*pnotes)
            }
        }
       else
-       changed = change_zero_ext (pat);
+       {
+         changed = change_pseudo_and_mask (pat);
+         changed |= change_zero_ext (pat);
+       }
     }
   else if (GET_CODE (pat) == PARALLEL)
     {
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
index 6bec2bddbde..5adbe9e9d27 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
@@ -4149,24 +4149,6 @@ (define_insn "rotl<mode>3_insert_3"
 }
   [(set_attr "type" "insert")])

-(define_code_iterator plus_ior_xor [plus ior xor])
-
-(define_split
-  [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "gpc_reg_operand")
-       (plus_ior_xor:GPR (ashift:GPR (match_operand:GPR 1 "gpc_reg_operand")
-                                     (match_operand:SI 2 "const_int_operand"))
-                         (match_operand:GPR 3 "gpc_reg_operand")))]
-  "nonzero_bits (operands[3], <MODE>mode)
-   < HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << INTVAL (operands[2])"
-  [(set (match_dup 0)
-       (ior:GPR (and:GPR (match_dup 3)
-                         (match_dup 4))
-                (ashift:GPR (match_dup 1)
-                            (match_dup 2))))]
-{
-  operands[4] = GEN_INT ((HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << INTVAL (operands[2])) - 1);
-})
-
 (define_insn "*rotl<mode>3_insert_4"
   [(set (match_operand:GPR 0 "gpc_reg_operand" "=r")
        (ior:GPR (and:GPR (match_operand:GPR 3 "gpc_reg_operand" "0")
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c
index 4017d34f429..e628be11532 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/20050603-3.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ void rotins (unsigned int x)
   b.y = (x<<12) | (x>>20);
 }

-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrlwinm} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrlwinm} { target ilp32 } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrldic} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mrot[lr]} } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\ms[lr][wd]} } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c
index bafa371db73..ffb5f9e450f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/rlwimi-2.c
@@ -2,14 +2,14 @@
 /* { dg-options "-O2" } */

 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+[a-z]} 14121 { target ilp32 } } 
} */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+[a-z]} 20217 { target lp64 } } } 
*/
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+[a-z]} 21279 { target lp64 } } } 
*/
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+blr} 6750 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+mr} 643 { target ilp32 } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+mr} 11 { target lp64 } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rldicl} 7790 { target lp64 } } } 
*/

 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rlwimi} 1692 { target ilp32 } } 
} */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rlwimi} 1666 { target lp64 } } } 
*/
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+rlwimi} 1692 { target lp64 } } } 
*/

 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+mulli} 5036 } } */

Reply via email to