Gentle ping:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587309.html

on 2021/12/23 上午10:06, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> This patch is to fix one wrong assertion which is too aggressive.
> Vectorizer can do vec_construct costing for the vector type which
> only has one unit.  For the failed case, the passed-in vector type
> is "vector(1) int", though it doesn't end up with any construction
> eventually.  We have to handle this kind of input in function
> rs6000_cost_data::update_target_cost_per_stmt.
> 
> Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9 and
> powerpc64-linux-gnu P8.
> 
> Is it ok for trunk?
> 
> BR,
> Kewen
> -----
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>       PR target/103702
>       * config/rs6000/rs6000.c
>       (rs6000_cost_data::update_target_cost_per_stmt): Fix one wrong
>       assertion with early return.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
>       PR target/103702
>       * gcc.target/powerpc/pr103702.c: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c                  |  7 ++++--
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103702.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103702.c
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> index 0b09713b2f5..37f07fe5358 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
> @@ -5461,8 +5461,11 @@ rs6000_cost_data::update_target_cost_per_stmt 
> (vect_cost_for_stmt kind,
>       {
>         tree vectype = STMT_VINFO_VECTYPE (stmt_info);
>         unsigned int nunits = vect_nunits_for_cost (vectype);
> -       /* We don't expect strided/elementwise loads for just 1 nunit.  */
> -       gcc_assert (nunits > 1);
> +       /* As PR103702 shows, it's possible that vectorizer wants to do
> +          costings for only one unit here, it's no need to do any
> +          penalization for it, so simply early return here.  */
> +       if (nunits == 1)
> +         return;
>         /* i386 port adopts nunits * stmt_cost as the penalized cost
>            for this kind of penalization, we used to follow it but
>            found it could result in an unreliable body cost especially
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103702.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103702.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..585946fd64b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr103702.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* We don't have one powerpc.*_ok for Power6, use altivec_ok conservatively. 
>  */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_altivec_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power6 -O2 -ftree-loop-vectorize 
> -fno-tree-scev-cprop" } */
> +
> +/* Verify there is no ICE.  */
> +
> +unsigned short a, e;
> +int *b, *d;
> +int c;
> +extern int fn2 ();
> +void
> +fn1 ()
> +{
> +  void *f;
> +  for (;;)
> +    {
> +      fn2 ();
> +      b = f;
> +      e = 0;
> +      for (; e < a; ++e)
> +     b[e] = d[e * c];
> +    }
> +}
> +
> --
> 2.27.0
> 

Reply via email to