On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> We only need to handle zero-extended addresses in DImode.
>>> OK for trunk?
>>
>>> 2012-03-02 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
>>>
>>> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address): Only handle
>>> zero-extended DImode addresses.
>>
>> OK.
>
> The patch was reverted due to PR target/52530.
>
Revert breaks Pmode == SImode for x32. Here is a different patch.
It checks Pmode == DImode instead of TARGET_64BIT. Tested on
Linux/x32. OK for trunk?
Thanks.
--
H.J.
----
2012-03-08 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address): Only handle
zero-extended DImode addresses if Pmode == DImode.
2012-03-08 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_address): Only handle
zero-extended DImode addresses if Pmode == DImode.
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 69cb6ae..c2cad5a 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -14548,7 +14548,7 @@ ix86_print_operand_address (FILE *file, rtx addr)
/* Print SImode registers for zero-extended addresses to force
addr32 prefix. Otherwise print DImode registers to avoid it. */
- if (TARGET_64BIT)
+ if (Pmode == DImode)
code = ((GET_CODE (addr) == ZERO_EXTEND
|| GET_CODE (addr) == AND)
? 'l'
