Martin, I've looked into removing the -Wno-error for this warning
for just a subset of targets. It seems doable with some hardcoding
in configure.ac but if you're planning to do the cleanup for all of
them I'm wondering if we should even bother. What do you think?
Martin
On 1/14/22 08:46, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
I noticed that when I run:
ACLOCAL=~/bin/automake-1.15.1/bin/aclocal
AUTOMAKE=~/bin/automake-1.15.1/bin/automake autoconf
in gcc subfolder I get the following diff:
diff --git a/gcc/configure b/gcc/configure
index d19059e13cc..ff570f73ef5 100755
--- a/gcc/configure
+++ b/gcc/configure
@@ -5352,7 +5352,26 @@ else
GDC="$ac_cv_prog_GDC"
fi
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking whether the D
compiler works" >&5
+$as_echo_n "checking whether the D compiler works... " >&6; }
+if ${acx_cv_d_compiler_works+:} false; then :
+ $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
+else
+ cat >conftest.d <<EOF
+module conftest; int main() { return 0; }
+EOF
+acx_cv_d_compiler_works=no
if test "x$GDC" != xno; then
+ errors=`(${GDC} -I"$srcdir"/d -c conftest.d) 2>&1 || echo failure`
+ if test x"$errors" = x && test -f conftest.$ac_objext; then
+ acx_cv_d_compiler_works=yes
+ fi
+ rm -f conftest.*
+fi
+fi
+{ $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result:
$acx_cv_d_compiler_works" >&5
+$as_echo "$acx_cv_d_compiler_works" >&6; }
+if test "x$GDC" != xno && test x$acx_cv_d_compiler_works != xno; then
have_gdc=yes
else
have_gdc=no
@@ -19640,7 +19659,7 @@ else
lt_dlunknown=0; lt_dlno_uscore=1; lt_dlneed_uscore=2
lt_status=$lt_dlunknown
cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<_LT_EOF
-#line 19643 "configure"
+#line 19662 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
#if HAVE_DLFCN_H
@@ -19746,7 +19765,7 @@ else
lt_dlunknown=0; lt_dlno_uscore=1; lt_dlneed_uscore=2
lt_status=$lt_dlunknown
cat > conftest.$ac_ext <<_LT_EOF
-#line 19749 "configure"
+#line 19768 "configure"
#include "confdefs.h"
#if HAVE_DLFCN_H
Am I correct that somebody forgot to re-generate the file?
Martin
