Thomas, > OK to push (after more testing) the attached > 'Revert parts of "[Ada] Reduce runtime dependencies on stage1"', for the > reason detailed therein? Should the comment before 'GNAT1_C_OBJS' be > re-instated/adjusted, too? Would appreciate a careful review, as I don't > really know what I'm doing there. ;-)
Unfortunately it's not OK, these are the most annoying/delicate dependencies, so we'd rather not reintroduce them. I'll instead update prerequisites to document that GCC 5.1 or later is required to build GNAT. Sorry for the inconvenience! Arno
