From: Andrew Pinski <apin...@marvell.com>

After the quoting changes in r12-6521-g03a1a86b5ee40d4e240, 
branch-protection-attr.c
fails due to expecting a different quoting type for "leaf".
This patch changes the quoting from "" to '' as that is what is used now.

Committed as obvious after a test of the testcase.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c: Fix quoting for
        the expected error message on line 5 of leaf.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c
index 229ce1ca7be..1d6e55f3907 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/branch-protection-attr.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ void __attribute__ ((target("branch-protection=leaf")))
 foo1 ()
 {
 }
-/* { dg-error {invalid protection type \("leaf"\) in 
'target\("branch-protection="\)' pragma or attribute} "" { target *-*-* } 5 } */
+/* { dg-error {invalid protection type \('leaf'\) in 
'target\("branch-protection="\)' pragma or attribute} "" { target *-*-* } 5 } */
 /* { dg-error {pragma or attribute 'target\("branch-protection=leaf"\)' is not 
valid} "" { target *-*-* } 5 } */
 
 void __attribute__ ((target("branch-protection=none+pac-ret")))
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to