On 03/15/2012 02:55 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:52, Jerry DeLisle<jvdeli...@charter.net>  wrote:
I like the idea behind this patch.  I confess, I have not studied the two
test cases that you are modifying, but the changes seem to stick out with
too many digits there.  Is this really correct?
When I get another moment, I will look closer. Maybe you can explain the
need for this change a little more.  Sorry if I am being to careful. Its
been many months since I delved into the formatting code.


The reason is that with the patch, the default rounding is whatever
snprintf() gives us. At least with glibc, snprintf() rounds ties to
even, but I'm not sure all implementations do this rather than
rounding ties to away. So the testcase changes just make sure that
we're not rounding a tie. E.g. "1.25" rounded to two significant
digits is "1.2" if one rounds ties to even, "1.3" if ties are rounded
away. So using "1.250001" ensures that the rounded value is "1.3" with
both rounding modes.

I suppose another option would be to assume that rounding is ties to
even, and keep an eye out for regressions on other targets.



Understood, thanks.  patch OK for trunk.


Jerry

Reply via email to