On Tue, 29 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:

> On 3/29/22 15:22, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Here we're crashing when diagnosing a failed __is_constructible constraint
> > because diagnose_atomic_constraint don't know how to diagnose a trait
> > that diagnose_trait_expr doesn't specifically handle.  This patch fixes
> > this by falling through to the default case in this situation.
> > 
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
> > trunk and perhaps 11?
> 
> Hmm, it seems reasonable, but I think it would be better to actually handle
> all the traits.  Removing the default, I get
> 
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value ‘CPTK_BASES’ not handled
> > in switch [-Wswitch]
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value ‘CPTK_DIRECT_BASES’ not
> > handled in switch [-Wswitch]
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value ‘CPTK_UNDERLYING_TYPE’ not
> > handled in switch [-Wswitch]
> 
> These we don't need to handle.
> 
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value
> > ‘CPTK_HAS_UNIQUE_OBJ_REPRESENTATIONS’ not handled in switch \
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value ‘CPTK_IS_AGGREGATE’ not
> > handled in switch [-Wswitch]
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value
> > ‘CPTK_IS_TRIVIALLY_ASSIGNABLE’ not handled in switch [-Wswit\
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value
> > ‘CPTK_IS_TRIVIALLY_CONSTRUCTIBLE’ not handled in switch [-Ws\
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value
> > ‘CPTK_IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch\
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value ‘CPTK_IS_ASSIGNABLE’ not
> > handled in switch [-Wswitch]
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value ‘CPTK_IS_CONSTRUCTIBLE’
> > not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value
> > ‘CPTK_IS_NOTHROW_ASSIGNABLE’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch\
> > constraint.cc:3585:10: warning: enumeration value
> > ‘CPTK_IS_NOTHROW_CONSTRUCTIBLE’ not handled in switch [-Wswi\
> 
> These we should.
> 
> I think we should leave off the default so that when we add more traits we get
> a warning that we need to handle them here.

Sounds good, like so?

-- >8 --

Subject: [PATCH] c++: ICE with failed __is_constructible constraint [PR100474]

Here we're crashing when diagnosing a failed __is_constructible constraint
because diagnose_trait_expr doesn't recognize this trait (along with a
bunch of other traits).  Fix this by adding handling for all remaining
traits and removing the default case so that when we add a new trait we
get a warning that diagnose_trait_expr needs to handle it.

Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk and perhaps 11?

        PR c++/100474

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

        * constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle all remaining
        traits appropriately.  Remove default case.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-traits3.C: New test.
---
 gcc/cp/constraint.cc                          | 41 +++++++++++-
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-traits3.C | 66 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-traits3.C

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
index c5a991b9e71..b970ac9772d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
@@ -3654,7 +3654,46 @@ diagnose_trait_expr (tree expr, tree args)
     case CPTK_IS_UNION:
       inform (loc, "  %qT is not a union", t1);
       break;
-    default:
+    case CPTK_IS_AGGREGATE:
+      inform (loc, "  %qT is not an aggregate", t1);
+      break;
+    case CPTK_IS_TRIVIALLY_COPYABLE:
+      inform (loc, "  %qT is not trivially copyable", t1);
+      break;
+    case CPTK_IS_ASSIGNABLE:
+      inform (loc, "  %qT is not assignable from %qT", t1, t2);
+      break;
+    case CPTK_IS_TRIVIALLY_ASSIGNABLE:
+      inform (loc, "  %qT is not trivially assignable from %qT", t1, t2);
+      break;
+    case CPTK_IS_NOTHROW_ASSIGNABLE:
+      inform (loc, "  %qT is not %<nothrow%> assignable from %qT", t1, t2);
+      break;
+    case CPTK_IS_CONSTRUCTIBLE:
+      if (!t2)
+       inform (loc, "  %qT is not default constructible", t1);
+      else
+       inform (loc, "  %qT is not constructible from %qE", t1, t2);
+      break;
+    case CPTK_IS_TRIVIALLY_CONSTRUCTIBLE:
+      if (!t2)
+       inform (loc, "  %qT is not trivially default constructible", t1);
+      else
+       inform (loc, "  %qT is not trivially constructible from %qE", t1, t2);
+      break;
+    case CPTK_IS_NOTHROW_CONSTRUCTIBLE:
+      if (!t2)
+       inform (loc, "  %qT is not %<nothrow%> default constructible", t1);
+      else
+       inform (loc, "  %qT is not %<nothrow%> constructible from %qE", t1, t2);
+      break;
+    case CPTK_HAS_UNIQUE_OBJ_REPRESENTATIONS:
+      inform (loc, "  %qT does not have unique object representations", t1);
+      break;
+    case CPTK_BASES:
+    case CPTK_DIRECT_BASES:
+    case CPTK_UNDERLYING_TYPE:
+      /* We shouldn't see these non-expression traits.  */
       gcc_unreachable ();
     }
 }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-traits3.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-traits3.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f20608b6918
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-traits3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+// PR c++/100474
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+struct S { S() = delete; S(const S&); };
+
+template<class T>
+concept Aggregate = __is_aggregate(T);
+// { dg-message "'S' is not an aggregate" "" { target *-*-* } .-1  }
+
+template<class T>
+concept TriviallyCopyable = __is_trivially_copyable(T);
+// { dg-message "'S' is not trivially copyable" "" { target *-*-* } .-1  }
+
+template<class T, class U>
+concept Assignable = __is_assignable(T, U);
+// { dg-message "'S' is not assignable from 'int'" "" { target *-*-* } .-1  }
+
+template<class T, class U>
+concept TriviallyAssignable = __is_trivially_assignable(T, U);
+// { dg-message "'S' is not trivially assignable from 'int'" "" { target *-*-* 
} .-1  }
+
+template<class T, class U>
+concept NothrowAssignable = __is_nothrow_assignable(T, U);
+// { dg-message "'S' is not 'nothrow' assignable from 'int'" "" { target *-*-* 
} .-1  }
+
+template<class T, class... Args>
+concept Constructible = __is_constructible(T, Args...);
+// { dg-message "'S' is not default constructible" "" { target *-*-* } .-1  }
+// { dg-message "'S' is not constructible from 'int'" "" { target *-*-* } .-2  
}
+// { dg-message "'S' is not constructible from 'int, char'" "" { target *-*-* 
} .-3  }
+
+template<class T, class... Args>
+concept TriviallyConstructible = __is_trivially_constructible(T, Args...);
+// { dg-message "'S' is not trivially default constructible" "" { target *-*-* 
} .-1  }
+// { dg-message "'S' is not trivially constructible from 'int'" "" { target 
*-*-* } .-2  }
+// { dg-message "'S' is not trivially constructible from 'int, char'" "" { 
target *-*-* } .-3  }
+
+template<class T, class... Args>
+concept NothrowConstructible = __is_nothrow_constructible(T, Args...);
+// { dg-message "'S' is not 'nothrow' default constructible" "" { target *-*-* 
} .-1  }
+// { dg-message "'S' is not 'nothrow' constructible from 'int'" "" { target 
*-*-* } .-2  }
+// { dg-message "'S' is not 'nothrow' constructible from 'int, char'" "" { 
target *-*-* } .-3  }
+
+template<class T>
+concept UniqueObjReps = __has_unique_object_representations(T);
+// { dg-message "'S' does not have unique object representations" "" { target 
*-*-* } .-1  }
+
+static_assert(Aggregate<S>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(TriviallyCopyable<S>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(Assignable<S, int>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(TriviallyAssignable<S, int>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(NothrowAssignable<S, int>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+
+static_assert(Constructible<S>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(Constructible<S, int>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(Constructible<S, int, char>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+
+static_assert(TriviallyConstructible<S>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(TriviallyConstructible<S, int>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(TriviallyConstructible<S, int, char>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+
+static_assert(NothrowConstructible<S>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(NothrowConstructible<S, int>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+static_assert(NothrowConstructible<S, int, char>); // { dg-error "assert" }
+
+static_assert(UniqueObjReps<S>); // { dg-error "assert" }
-- 
2.35.1.693.g805e0a6808

Reply via email to