On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 08:11:43PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> v1 -> v2:
>
> * "int has_zero_width_bf_abi_change" -> "bool
> zero_width_field_abi_change". "int" -> "bool" because it's only 0/1,
> "bf" -> "field" because the change also affects zero-length arrays and
> empty structs/unions, etc.
>
> * Add tests with zero-length array and empty struct.
>
> * Coding style fix.
>
> * "#zero_width_bitfields" -> "#mips_zero_width_fields" because this is
> not the exactly same change documented by #zero_width_bitfields. I'll
> send a wwwdoc patch after this is approved.
>
> gcc/
> PR target/102024
> * mips.cc (mips_function_arg): Ignore zero-width fields, and
> inform if it causes a psABI change.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR target/102024
> * gcc.target/mips/pr102024-1.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/mips/pr102024-2.c: New test.
> * gcc.target/mips/pr102024-3.c: New test.
LGTM, thanks.
Jakub
