On 4/4/22 12:04 PM, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
Dear all,
Steve's analysis (see PR) showed that we confused the case when a
symbol refererred to a recursive procedure which was named the same
as an intrinsic. The standard allows such recursive references
(see e.g. F2018:19.3.1).
The attached patch is based on Steve's, but handles both functions
and subroutines. Testcase verified with NAG and Crayftn.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
This bug is a rejects-valid, but could also lead to wrong code,
see e.g. the PR, comment#4. Would this qualify for a backport
to e.g. the 11-branch?
Thanks,
Harald
Yes, looks good, OK to commit
Regards,
Jerry
