v2: Add psABI warning and test.

--

This fixes tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/{t032,t059} failure.  Clang++
also ignores C++17 empty bases in return values.

gcc/
        * config/mips/mips.cc (mips_fpr_return_fields): Ignore
        cxx17_empty_base_field_p fields and set an indicator.
        (mips_return_in_msb): Adjust for mips_fpr_return_fields change.
        (mips_function_value_1): Inform psABI change about C++ 17 empty
        bases.

gcc/testsuite/
        * g++.target/mips/cxx17_empty_base.C: New test.
---
 gcc/config/mips/mips.cc                       | 58 +++++++++++++++++--
 .../g++.target/mips/cxx17_empty_base.C        | 20 +++++++
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/mips/cxx17_empty_base.C

diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc b/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc
index 079bb03968a..57ce0884951 100644
--- a/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc
@@ -6346,12 +6346,21 @@ mips_callee_copies (cumulative_args_t, const 
function_arg_info &arg)
    The C++ FE used to remove zero-width bit-fields in GCC 11 and earlier.
    To make a proper diagnostic, this function will set
    HAS_CXX_ZERO_WIDTH_BF to true once a C++ zero-width bit-field shows up,
-   and then ignore it. Then the caller can determine if this zero-width
-   bit-field will make a difference and emit a -Wpsabi inform.  */
+   and then ignore it.
+
+   We had failed to ignore C++ 17 empty bases in GCC 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.
+   This caused an ABI incompatibility between C++ 14 and C++ 17.  This is
+   fixed now and to make a proper diagnostic, this function will set
+   HAS_CXX17_EMPTY_BASE to true once a C++ 17 empty base shows up, and
+   then ignore it.
+
+   The caller should use the value of HAS_CXX17_EMPTY_BASE and/or
+   HAS_CXX_ZERO_WIDTH_BF to emit a proper -Wpsabi inform.  */
 
 static int
 mips_fpr_return_fields (const_tree valtype, tree *fields,
-                       bool *has_cxx_zero_width_bf)
+                       bool *has_cxx_zero_width_bf,
+                       bool *has_cxx17_empty_base)
 {
   tree field;
   int i;
@@ -6368,6 +6377,12 @@ mips_fpr_return_fields (const_tree valtype, tree *fields,
       if (TREE_CODE (field) != FIELD_DECL)
        continue;
 
+      if (cxx17_empty_base_field_p (field))
+       {
+         *has_cxx17_empty_base = true;
+         continue;
+       }
+
       if (DECL_FIELD_CXX_ZERO_WIDTH_BIT_FIELD (field))
        {
          *has_cxx_zero_width_bf = true;
@@ -6403,8 +6418,13 @@ mips_return_in_msb (const_tree valtype)
 
   tree fields[2];
   bool has_cxx_zero_width_bf = false;
+
+  /* Its value is not used.  */
+  bool has_cxx17_empty_base = false;
+
   return (mips_fpr_return_fields (valtype, fields,
-                                 &has_cxx_zero_width_bf) == 0
+                                 &has_cxx_zero_width_bf,
+                                 &has_cxx17_empty_base) == 0
          || has_cxx_zero_width_bf);
 }
 
@@ -6501,11 +6521,18 @@ mips_function_value_1 (const_tree valtype, const_tree 
fn_decl_or_type,
       mode = promote_function_mode (valtype, mode, &unsigned_p, func, 1);
 
       bool has_cxx_zero_width_bf = false;
+      bool has_cxx17_empty_base = false;
       int use_fpr = mips_fpr_return_fields (valtype, fields,
-                                           &has_cxx_zero_width_bf);
+                                           &has_cxx_zero_width_bf,
+                                           &has_cxx17_empty_base);
+
+      /* If has_cxx_zero_width_bf and has_cxx17_empty_base are both
+        true, it *happens* that there is no ABI change.  So we won't
+        inform in this case.  */
       if (TARGET_HARD_FLOAT
          && warn_psabi
          && has_cxx_zero_width_bf
+         && !has_cxx17_empty_base
          && use_fpr != 0)
        {
          static unsigned last_reported_type_uid;
@@ -6527,6 +6554,27 @@ mips_function_value_1 (const_tree valtype, const_tree 
fn_decl_or_type,
       if (has_cxx_zero_width_bf)
        use_fpr = 0;
 
+      if (TARGET_HARD_FLOAT
+         && warn_psabi
+         && use_fpr != 0
+         && has_cxx17_empty_base)
+       {
+         static unsigned last_reported_type_uid;
+         unsigned uid = TYPE_UID (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (valtype));
+         if (uid != last_reported_type_uid)
+           {
+             static const char *url
+               = CHANGES_ROOT_URL
+                 "gcc-12/changes.html#mips_cxx17_empty_bases";
+             inform (input_location,
+                     "the ABI for returning a value with C++ 17 empty "
+                     "bases but otherwise an aggregate with only one or "
+                     "two floating-point fields was changed in GCC "
+                     "%{12.1%}", url);
+             last_reported_type_uid = uid;
+           }
+       }
+
       /* Handle structures whose fields are returned in $f0/$f2.  */
       switch (use_fpr)
        {
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/mips/cxx17_empty_base.C 
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/mips/cxx17_empty_base.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..da6d54b95d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/mips/cxx17_empty_base.C
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-O2 -std=c++17 -mabi=64 -mhard-float" }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler "\\\$f0" } }
+
+struct empty {};
+
+struct foo : empty
+{
+  double a;
+  double b;
+};
+
+struct foo
+make_foo(void) // { dg-message "the ABI for returning a value with C\\\+\\\+ 
17 empty bases but otherwise an aggregate with only one or two floating-point 
fields was changed in GCC 12.1" }
+{
+  struct foo ret;
+  ret.a = 114;
+  ret.b = 514;
+  return ret;
+}
-- 
2.35.1


Reply via email to