> Finally, there is already stuff in libiberty not related to > portability. E.g., hashtab or the demangler.
Yeah, I know, hence my "Should I give up that premise?" > I guess I can just put the whole DW_TAG_ prefix in there. That > isn't a big deal. Or if you have some other suggestion, I can > implement it. If the macros always prepend something to it, it should be safe enough, despite technically violating the spirit of the rule. I have no other suggestions. But given you've already had the issue with "and", you're already seeing problems anyway, so maybe that's a sign that it's not actually "safe enough" ?