On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches wrote:
> + if (typedef_variant_p (type))
> + {
> + /* Set up the typedef all over again. */
This seems wrong when the typedef is just being used in another
declaration with the mode attribute, as opposed to being defined using the
mode attribute. E.g. the following test is valid and accepted before the
patch, but wrongly rejected after the patch because the typedef has had
its type changed.
typedef int I;
int x;
I y __attribute__ ((mode(QI)));
extern I x;
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
