LGTM, that's only added a new option for RISC-V and won't affect all
other targets, so I assume I can approve that.
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 8:27 AM Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> Similar to 37e65643d3e ("testsuite/101269: fix testcase when used with
> -m32"), RISC-V needs to be told not to put symbols in the
> sdata/srodata/sbss sections.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>
> * debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c: Don't use small data on RISC-V.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
> index dbb236bbda1..77df88648c5 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> /* { dg-do compile ) */
> /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
> /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -msdata=none" { target { { powerpc*-*-* } &&
> ilp32 } } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -msmall-data-limit=0" { target { riscv*-*-* }
> } } */
> /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA -G0" { target { nios2-*-* } } } */
>
> /* Check for two DATASEC entries with vlen 3, and one with vlen 1. */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
