Hi, The attached patch adjusts vec_perm_const hook to accommodate the new parameter. For rationale, please see: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-May/595128.html
Unfortunately, I am not sure how to cross test this patch. make all-gcc stage-1 seems to build fine. Is it OK to commit the patch ? Thanks, Prathamesh
diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc b/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc index e64928f4113..5eb845960e1 100644 --- a/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc +++ b/gcc/config/mips/mips.cc @@ -21790,9 +21790,13 @@ mips_expand_vec_perm_const_1 (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d) /* Implement TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST. */ static bool -mips_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, rtx target, rtx op0, - rtx op1, const vec_perm_indices &sel) +mips_vectorize_vec_perm_const (machine_mode vmode, machine_mode op_mode, + rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1, + const vec_perm_indices &sel) { + if (vmode != op_mode) + return false; + struct expand_vec_perm_d d; int i, nelt, which; unsigned char orig_perm[MAX_VECT_LEN];