On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 15:21 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 02:26:17PM -0500, will schmidt wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-06-06 at 20:31 -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > > > (define_insn "vsx_xxspltd_<mode>" > > > [(set (match_operand:VSX_D 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa") > > > - (unspec:VSX_D [(match_operand:VSX_D 1 > > > "vsx_register_operand" > > > "wa") > > Someone (you?) uses format=flawed. You cannot reply to emails that > contain patches that way, it messes up everything :-(
Right.. Something on my end may be posessed, several of my emails today have tried to go all HTML on me, and or otherwise gone format-wonky, which I do not want. ;-) > > > > - (match_operand:QI 2 "u5bit_cint_operand" "i")] > > > - UNSPEC_VSX_XXSPLTD))] > > > + (vec_duplicate:VSX_D > > > + (vec_select:<VS_scalar> > > > + (match_operand:VSX_D 1 "gpc_reg_operand" "wa") > > > + (parallel [(match_operand:QI 2 "const_0_to_1_operand" > > > "i")]))))] > > > "VECTOR_MEM_VSX_P (<MODE>mode)" > > > > Noting that > > (define_mode_iterator VSX_D [V2DF V2DI]) > > (define_mode_attr VS_scalar [(V1TI "TI") > > (V2DF "DF") > > (V2DI "DI") > > (V4SF "SF") > > (V4SI "SI") > > (V8HI "HI") > > (V16QI "QI")]) > > Yeah, the comment > ;; Map the scalar mode for a vector type > is misleading, in more ways than one :-( > > And the whole thing is just the same as VEC_base anyway, so it is > much > better to just use that. > > > Segher
