On 03/29/2012 03:06 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The exception specification on old_decl doesn't matter; we can drop
that test.
I seem to remember something going wrong with templates otherwise,
because implicitly_declare_fn has gcc_assert (!dependent_type_p (type));


We shouldn't be doing this for templates anyway, as in general we can't know what the implicitly declared function will look like.

Jason

Reply via email to