On 03/30/2012 12:43 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 03/30/2012 12:37 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
>> Not yet regstrapped, so no rfa, but does this seem sane?
> It definitely seems plausible.  I can't immediately think of
> anything you might have forgotten.

Stating the obvious, but you'd do well to add at least an
x86 test case that does a call to a local function which does throw.


Reply via email to