When init_expr is INTEGER_CST or REAL_CST, can_vec_perm_const_p is not necessary since there's no real vec_perm needed, but vec_gen_perm_mask_checked will gcc_assert (can_vec_perm_const_p). So it's better to use vec_gen_perm_mask_any in vect_create_nonlinear_iv_init.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu{-m32,}. Ok for trunk? gcc/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/106963 * tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_create_nonlinear_iv_init): Use vec_gen_perm_mask_any instead of vec_gen_perm_mask_check. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/i386/pr106963.c: New test. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106963.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106963.c diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106963.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106963.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9f2d20e2523 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106963.c @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx -mno-avx2" } */ + +void +foo_neg_const (int *a) +{ + int i, b = 1; + + for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) + { + a[i] = b; + b = -b; + } +} diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc index 9c434b66c5b..aabdc6f2d81 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop.cc @@ -8356,8 +8356,11 @@ vect_create_nonlinear_iv_init (gimple_seq* stmts, tree init_expr, sel[2 * i + 1] = i + nunits; } vec_perm_indices indices (sel, 2, nunits); + /* Don't use vect_gen_perm_mask_checked since can_vec_perm_const_p may + fail when vec_init is const vector. In that situation vec_perm is not + really needed. */ tree perm_mask_even - = vect_gen_perm_mask_checked (vectype, indices); + = vect_gen_perm_mask_any (vectype, indices); vec_init = gimple_build (stmts, VEC_PERM_EXPR, vectype, vec_init, vec_neg, -- 2.18.1