On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 9:41 PM, DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Ping 6... > > It's now been over EIGHT MONTHS since I posted the patch, back in > stage 1 for 4.7. Can someone please review and/or approve this before > gcc 4.8's stage 1 is closed? This is needed as a first step for ABI > compatibility for rx-elf.
If it's required for ABI compatibility why is this an attribute and not a target hook? >> Ping 5... >> >> > Ping 4... >> > >> > > Ping 3? It's been months with no feedback... >> > > >> > > > Ping 2 ? >> > > > >> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01889.html >> > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02555.html >> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00529.html >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01246.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-02/msg00636.html
