On 10/3/22 02:08, Eugene Rozenfeld wrote:
This change is based on commit 1e6c4a7a8fb8e20545bb9f9032d3854f3f794c18
by Dehao Chen in vendors/google/heads/gcc-4_8.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Brief rationale for the change?
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-cfg.cc (assign_discriminators): Set discriminators for call
stmts
on the same line within the same basic block.
---
gcc/tree-cfg.cc | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.cc b/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
index ade66c54499..8e2a3a5f6c6 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
@@ -1203,8 +1203,39 @@ assign_discriminators (void)
{
edge e;
edge_iterator ei;
+ gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
gimple *last = last_stmt (bb);
location_t locus = last ? gimple_location (last) : UNKNOWN_LOCATION;
+ location_t curr_locus = UNKNOWN_LOCATION;
+ int curr_discr = 0;
+
+ /* Traverse the basic block, if two function calls within a basic block
+ are mapped to the same line, assign a new discriminator because a call
+ stmt could be a split point of a basic block. */
+ for (gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb); !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
+ {
+ gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
+ expanded_location curr_locus_e;
+ if (curr_locus == UNKNOWN_LOCATION)
+ {
+ curr_locus = gimple_location (stmt);
+ curr_locus_e = expand_location (curr_locus);
+ }
+ else if (!same_line_p (curr_locus, &curr_locus_e, gimple_location
(stmt)))
+ {
+ curr_locus = gimple_location (stmt);
+ curr_locus_e = expand_location (curr_locus);
+ curr_discr = 0;
+ }
+ else if (curr_discr != 0)
+ {
+ gimple_set_location (stmt, location_with_discriminator (
+ gimple_location (stmt), curr_discr));
This indentation is wonky, with an open paren at the end of the line;
I'd suggest reformatting to
location_t dloc = (location_with_discriminator > (gimple_location (stmt),
curr_discr));> gimple_set_location (stmt, dloc);
Jason