On Apr 3, 2012, at 16:34 , Olivier Hainque wrote:
> Thanks a lot for following up on this one. Coincidentally, I was just
> about to submit the alternate approach we had discussed about, after
> David's comment at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01842.html.
> This is of course a much heavier hammer so it would be nice if we can
> indeed have a subtler way out :-)
I realized that this last sentence is ambiguous ...
To clarify: the heavier approach is the one I was about to submit
(minor variation of Joseph's proposal in the thread just referenced),
and the subtler way out is the one you are proposing here.