Re: [google] Work around PR52796 by replacing empty packs with explicit overloads. (issue5971053)

[Paolo Carlini]

> On 04/01/2012 12:38 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> I'm not sure it makes sense to propose it for gcc-4_6-branch. Jason/Ben,
>> any opinions on PR 52796 and what should we do for gcc-4_6-branch?
> 
> Fixed.  :)

I'm so relieved, seriously.

Thanks,
Paolo