On 04/04/2012 11:38 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Hi Christian,

You have to add the testcases from both PR52283 and PR37985, and an
appropriate Changelog, and bootstrap+regression test everything and
double-check that the new testcases don't fail and no old testcases
fail with the patch (by comparing with the testcases that fail without
the patch).

The testscase was part of the attached patch, along with the ChangeLog entries

It was bootstrapped and regtested for C and C++ on x86 (that was in bugzilla comment #22), sorry I should have mentioned it here too. done now :)





On 4 April 2012 10:17, Christian Bruel<christian.br...@st.com>  wrote:

Is it OK to push the cleaning of TREE_NO_WARNING to fix the constant
expressions errors discrepancies, as discussed in bugzilla #52283, now that
the trunk is open ?

Many thanks,

Reply via email to