On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:09:46 -0500
Dennis Gilmore <den...@gilmore.net.au> wrote:
> Fedora does use /lib64 on x86_64 I would personally prefer /libhfp but
> wouldn't object to /libhf though today we have f17 about to go beta
> and all of rawhide built using /lib
One potential problem that is born from the /libhf suggestion is the danger
of having a new top level directory (/libhf) with only one file, the dynamic
linker. AFAIU it, no distro is currently willing to move away from its existing
scheme (/lib), Debian is most likely not going to, at best there could be a
symlink /libhf -> /lib/<triplet>, but that is not solving the problem IMHO.
What about other distros, if everyone is going to use a symlink for /libhf,
then even suggesting it and relying on new top-level directories to solve the
problem is the wrong approach.
Loic suggested a -IMHO- better solution: to change the dynamic linker filename,
not the dir, i.e. /lib/ld-linux-hf.so.3 (for this particular case).
Konstantinos Margaritis <konstantinos.margari...@linaro.org>