On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 2:05 PM Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: > > On 11/9/22 18:14, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote: > > > >> 1) not synchronized content among lib*/Makefile.in and lib*/Makefile.am. > >> Apparently, I modified the generated Makefile.in file with the rules like: > >> > >> doc/info/texinfo/libitm.info: $(SPHINX_FILES) > >> + if [ x$(HAS_SPHINX_BUILD) = xhas-sphinx-build ]; then \ > >> make -C $(srcdir)/../doc info SOURCEDIR=$(abs_srcdir)/doc > >> BUILDDIR=$(abs_doc_builddir)/info SPHINXBUILD=$(SPHINX_BUILD); \ > >> else true; fi > >> > >> Can you please modify Makefile.am in the corresponding manner and > >> re-generate Makefile.in? > > > > I think someone else had best look at this. > > All right, I've got a patch candidate for it, so I'll be hopefully able to > manage. > > > > >> 2) Adding proper support --enable-generated-files-in-srcdir in gcc_release: > > > > It looks like all the GENINSRC rules / conditionals are still present. > > So maybe there are details where the paths are wrong, or where fixes are > > needed to ensure the files get installed from the source directory when > > available in the source directory but not available in the build directory > > because Sphinx isn't available, but much of the code for the feature is > > still there. > > I can investigate then. Is the option --enable-generated-files-in-srcdir > suppose > to be used when building from a release tarball (that includes man/info in > src), > or to create such a source tarball?
It's to create such a tarball which then can be built with a reduced toolset. > Cheers, > Martin >
