Release managers, On Sun, 11 Sep 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I'd like to make the change below which helps with lower resolution > systems (or non-maximized web browsers) or larger font sizes. > > Practically I think everyone would understand the new version is the > same as the old, and the official status links usually are more explicit, > but still -- any objections from the RMs?
what is your take on this? Updated patch below. Gerald Index: index.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.848 diff -u -3 -p -r1.848 index.html --- index.html 22 Mar 2012 09:58:00 -0000 1.848 +++ index.html 9 Apr 2012 13:46:56 -0000 @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ Any additions? Don't be shy, send them <!--GCC 4.7 status below--> <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-03/msg00345.html";>2012-03-14</a> <!--GCC 4.7 status above--> - (regression fixes and docs only). + (regression fixes and docs). <br /> <span class="regress"> <a @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ Any additions? Don't be shy, send them <!--GCC 4.6 status below--> <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-03/msg00006.html";>2012-03-01</a> <!--GCC 4.6 status above--> - (regression fixes and docs only). + (regression fixes and docs). <br /> <span class="regress"> <a @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ Any additions? Don't be shy, send them <!--GCC 4.5 status below--> <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-04/msg00412.html";>2011-04-29</a> <!--GCC 4.5 status above--> - (regression fixes and docs only). + (regression fixes and docs). <span class="regress"> <br /> <a
