On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 03:28:13PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 08:25:26AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches:
> > > 
> > > > diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > > > index 726392409b6..2de14466dd3 100644
> > > > --- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > > > +++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
> > > > @@ -16510,6 +16510,14 @@ The option cannot be combined with 
> > > > @option{-fsanitize=thread} or
> > > >  @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress}.  Note that the only target
> > > >  @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress} is currently supported on is AArch64.
> > > >  
> > > > +To get more accurate stack traces, it is possible to use options such 
> > > > as
> > > > +@option{-O} (which, for instance, prevents most function inlining),
> > > > +@option{-fno-optimize-sibling-calls} (which prevents optimizing sibling
> > > > +and tail recursive calls), or @option{-fno-ipa-icf} (which disables 
> > > > Identical
> > > > +Code Folding for functions and read-only variables).  Since multiple 
> > > > runs
> > > > +of the program may yield backtraces with different addresses due to 
> > > > ASLR,
> > > > +it may be desirable to turn off ASLR: @samp{setarch `uname -m` -R 
> > > > ./prog}.
> > > 
> > > What about -fasynchronous-unwind-tables?  It should help if ASAN ever
> > > reports stray segmentation faults.  Whether it also helps in general
> > > depends on whether ASAN maintains ABI around its instrumentation.
> > 
> > I'm not sure.  Someone else will have to decide if we want to mention
> > that option as well.
> 
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables is on by default on many targets, so I wouldn't
> mention it:
> grep asynchronous_unwind_tables common/*/*/* config/*/*
> common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.cc:    { OPT_LEVELS_ALL, 
> OPT_fasynchronous_unwind_tables, NULL, 1 },
> common/config/i386/i386-common.cc:  opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 
> 2;
> common/config/loongarch/loongarch-common.cc:  { OPT_LEVELS_ALL, 
> OPT_fasynchronous_unwind_tables, NULL, 1 },
> common/config/rs6000/rs6000-common.cc:  
> opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 1;
> common/config/s390/s390-common.cc:  opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 
> 1;
> config/i386/i386-options.cc:      if (opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables 
> == 2)
> config/i386/i386-options.cc:  opts->x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 
> !USE_IX86_FRAME_POINTER;
> config/mips/mips.cc:      && 
> !global_options_set.x_flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables)
> config/mips/mips.cc:    flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 1;
> config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:      && !OPTION_SET_P 
> (flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables))
> config/rs6000/rs6000.cc:    flag_asynchronous_unwind_tables = 1;
> 
> On the other side, the @samp{setarch `uname -m` -R ./prog} suggestion is
> very Linux specific, so if we mention it at all, it should mention that
> "e.g. on Linux through ..." or something similar.
> I also wouldn't mention the "and read-only variables" part, that is
> irrelevant for stack traces.

Thanks, updated patch here.  I've also expanded the ASLR acronym.

Ok?

-- >8 --
I got a complaint that while Clang docs suggest options that improve
the quality of the backtraces ASAN prints (cf.
<https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html#usage>), our docs
don't say anything to that effect.  This patch amends that with a new
paragraph.  (It deliberately doesn't mention -fno-omit-frame-pointer.)

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * doc/invoke.texi (-fsanitize=address): Suggest options to improve
        stack traces.
---
 gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 726392409b6..1641efecf18 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -16510,6 +16510,15 @@ The option cannot be combined with 
@option{-fsanitize=thread} or
 @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress}.  Note that the only target
 @option{-fsanitize=hwaddress} is currently supported on is AArch64.
 
+To get more accurate stack traces, it is possible to use options such as
+@option{-O} (which, for instance, prevents most function inlining),
+@option{-fno-optimize-sibling-calls} (which prevents optimizing sibling
+and tail recursive calls), or @option{-fno-ipa-icf} (which disables Identical
+Code Folding for functions).  Since multiple runs of the program may yield
+backtraces with different addresses due to ASLR (Address Space Layout
+Randomization), it may be desirable to turn ASLR off.  On Linux, this can be
+achieved with @samp{setarch `uname -m` -R ./prog}.
+
 @item -fsanitize=kernel-address
 @opindex fsanitize=kernel-address
 Enable AddressSanitizer for Linux kernel.

base-commit: d9f9d5d30feb33c359955d7030cc6be50ef6dc0a
-- 
2.38.1

Reply via email to