On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 7:30 AM Kito Cheng <kito.ch...@sifive.com> wrote:

> just one more nit: Use INVALID_REGNUM as sentinel value for
> riscv_next_saved_reg, otherwise LGTM, and feel free to commit that
> separately :)
>

Would this change below be ok?

@@ -5540,7 +5540,7 @@ riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned
int limit,
   if (inc)
     regno++;

-  while (regno <= limit)
+  while (regno <= limit && regno != INVALID_REGNUM)
     {
       if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST))
        {

Thanks,
Christoph



>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 9:08 AM Christoph Muellner
> <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu> wrote:
> >
> > From: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
> >
> > This patch restructures the loop over the GP registers
> > which saves/restores then as part of the prologue/epilogue.
> > No functional change is intended by this patch, but it
> > offers the possibility to use load-pair/store-pair instructions.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_next_saved_reg): New function.
> >         (riscv_is_eh_return_data_register): New function.
> >         (riscv_for_each_saved_reg): Restructure loop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muell...@vrull.eu>
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> > index 6dd2ab2d11e..a8d5e1dac7f 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> > @@ -4835,6 +4835,49 @@ riscv_save_restore_reg (machine_mode mode, int
> regno,
> >    fn (gen_rtx_REG (mode, regno), mem);
> >  }
> >
> > +/* Return the next register up from REGNO up to LIMIT for the callee
> > +   to save or restore.  OFFSET will be adjusted accordingly.
> > +   If INC is set, then REGNO will be incremented first.  */
> > +
> > +static unsigned int
> > +riscv_next_saved_reg (unsigned int regno, unsigned int limit,
> > +                     HOST_WIDE_INT *offset, bool inc = true)
> > +{
> > +  if (inc)
> > +    regno++;
> > +
> > +  while (regno <= limit)
> > +    {
> > +      if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST))
> > +       {
> > +         *offset = *offset - UNITS_PER_WORD;
> > +         break;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +      regno++;
> > +    }
> > +  return regno;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Return TRUE if provided REGNO is eh return data register.  */
> > +
> > +static bool
> > +riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (unsigned int regno)
> > +{
> > +  unsigned int i, regnum;
> > +
> > +  if (!crtl->calls_eh_return)
> > +    return false;
> > +
> > +  for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) != INVALID_REGNUM;
> i++)
> > +    if (regno == regnum)
> > +      {
> > +       return true;
> > +      }
> > +
> > +  return false;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Call FN for each register that is saved by the current function.
> >     SP_OFFSET is the offset of the current stack pointer from the start
> >     of the frame.  */
> > @@ -4844,36 +4887,31 @@ riscv_for_each_saved_reg (poly_int64 sp_offset,
> riscv_save_restore_fn fn,
> >                           bool epilogue, bool maybe_eh_return)
> >  {
> >    HOST_WIDE_INT offset;
> > +  unsigned int regno;
> > +  unsigned int start = GP_REG_FIRST;
> > +  unsigned int limit = GP_REG_LAST;
> >
> >    /* Save the link register and s-registers. */
> > -  offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant
> ();
> > -  for (unsigned int regno = GP_REG_FIRST; regno <= GP_REG_LAST; regno++)
> > -    if (BITSET_P (cfun->machine->frame.mask, regno - GP_REG_FIRST))
> > -      {
> > -       bool handle_reg =
> !cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno];
> > -
> > -       /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the
> eh_return
> > -          builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as
> that
> > -          would clobber the return value.  But we do still need to save
> them
> > -          in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so
> we
> > -          need special handling here.  */
> > -       if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return && crtl->calls_eh_return)
> > -         {
> > -           unsigned int i, regnum;
> > -
> > -           for (i = 0; (regnum = EH_RETURN_DATA_REGNO (i)) !=
> INVALID_REGNUM;
> > -                i++)
> > -             if (regno == regnum)
> > -               {
> > -                 handle_reg = FALSE;
> > -                 break;
> > -               }
> > -         }
> > -
> > -       if (handle_reg)
> > -         riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn);
> > -       offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD;
> > -      }
> > +  offset = (cfun->machine->frame.gp_sp_offset - sp_offset).to_constant
> ()
> > +          + UNITS_PER_WORD;
> > +  for (regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (start, limit, &offset, false);
> > +       regno <= limit;
> > +       regno = riscv_next_saved_reg (regno, limit, &offset))
> > +    {
> > +      if (cfun->machine->reg_is_wrapped_separately[regno])
> > +       continue;
> > +
> > +      /* If this is a normal return in a function that calls the
> eh_return
> > +        builtin, then do not restore the eh return data registers as
> that
> > +        would clobber the return value.  But we do still need to save
> them
> > +        in the prologue, and restore them for an exception return, so we
> > +        need special handling here.  */
> > +      if (epilogue && !maybe_eh_return
> > +         && riscv_is_eh_return_data_register (regno))
> > +       continue;
> > +
> > +      riscv_save_restore_reg (word_mode, regno, offset, fn);
> > +    }
> >
> >    /* This loop must iterate over the same space as its companion in
> >       riscv_compute_frame_info.  */
> > --
> > 2.38.1
> >
>

Reply via email to